Surgical Instrument Torsion Spring Removal for Safe Reprocessing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for reprocessing surgical instruments, particularly those used in tonsillectomies and adenoidectomies, face challenges in efficient disassembly and sterilization, leading to potential reuse of damaged or worn-out components, which can compromise instrument performance and safety.

Innovation Solution

A method for disassembling surgical instruments involves accessing internal components such as the slider assembly, drive plate, and torsion spring, followed by sterilization of individual parts, including the elongated outer shaft, end effector assembly, and jaw wires, to enable thorough cleaning and reassembly, ensuring the reuse of functional parts while replacing worn-out ones.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If surgical instruments are disassembled for reprocessing, then sterilization effectiveness is improved, but reprocessing time and complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesterilization effectivenessVSAvoidreprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The surgical instrument is divided into multiple separable components including the handle assembly, shaft, end effector, torsion spring, and various internal mechanisms. This segmentation allows each component to be independently sterilized, reducing overall reprocessing time while maintaining sterilization effectiveness for each part.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The instrument is designed with pre-configured disassembly features such as accessible pivot pins, snap-fit connections, and modular components that can be quickly separated without complex tools. This preliminary design of easy-disassembly features reduces the time required for reprocessing while ensuring proper sterilization access to all surfaces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If surgical instruments are disassembled for reprocessing, then cleaning thoroughness is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecleaning thoroughnessVSAvoidreprocessing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The instrument comprises modular segments including the handle with trigger assembly, the shaft with internal mechanisms, and the end effector with jaw wires and cutting elements. Each segment can be separated and cleaned individually, allowing thorough access to internal surfaces while organizing the reprocessing workflow into manageable steps.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Specific components such as the torsion spring, pivot pins, and end effector assembly are extracted from the main instrument body for separate processing. This extraction allows for detailed cleaning and inspection of complex internal mechanisms that would be inaccessible in the assembled state, while the removed components can be processed independently.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Reliability

If worn components are replaced during reprocessing, then instrument safety is improved, but reprocessing cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinstrument safetyVSAvoidreprocessing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The instrument design allows for selective replacement of wear-prone components such as the end effector, jaw wires, and cutting elements, while retaining and reusing durable components like the handle assembly, shaft, and mechanical linkages. This approach extends instrument life and reduces costs by recovering valuable components for multiple uses.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #34Discarding and recovering

Solution Approach 2:

Different components have different replacement frequencies based on their wear characteristics. High-wear components like the end effector and jaw wires are designed for periodic replacement, while low-wear components like the handle and shaft are designed for long-term reuse. This localized quality approach optimizes safety by replacing only the necessary components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach allows for effective sterilization and reassembly of surgical instruments, enhancing their performance and safety by ensuring only functional parts are reused, thereby maintaining instrument efficacy and reducing the risk of infection.

Implementation Method 1

a torsion spring of the surgical instrument

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTorsion spring: Torsion Spring

Data Source

PatentUS11123133B2Method of reprocessing a surgical instrument
Publication Date: 2021.09.21 COVIDIEN LP
  • US11123133B2 patent drawing
  • US11123133B2 patent drawing
  • US11123133B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of disassembling a surgical instrument for reprocessing, includes accessing an interior housing of a surgical instrument to expose a slider assembly, an elongated outer shaft including a drive plate and knife assembly extending therethrough, and a torsion spring of the surgical instrument. The method further includes grasping an upper leg of the torsion spring to disengage the upper leg from a slot defined within the drive plate, disengaging the drive plate from the slider assembly, and removing the torsion spring from the slider assembly.