Torso-Mounted Triaxial Accelerometer for Running Asymmetry Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing devices and methods for measuring biomechanical efficiency of a runner's stride are complex, costly, and inaccurate, failing to provide real-time, portable, and self-sufficient analysis of parameters linked to the runner's center of gravity, and do not effectively detect asymmetries that can lead to injury or fatigue.

Innovation Solution

A portable device with a triaxial accelerometer fastened to the runner's torso, near the center of gravity, measures acceleration data in multiple directions to calculate biomechanical parameters, including asymmetries, and displays them in real-time for improved training and injury prevention.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If a triaxial accelerometer is fastened to the runner's torso near the center of gravity, then measurement precision of biomechanical parameters is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebiomechanical parametersVSAvoiddevice
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The device is segmented into three independent accelerometer axes (X, Y, Z) that can be processed separately, allowing complex biomechanical analysis through simple linear acceleration measurements in each direction

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The triaxial accelerometer serves multiple functions: measuring vertical acceleration, horizontal acceleration, and detecting asymmetries between left and right movements, all from a single device placed on the torso

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Measurement precision

If force sensors are used in treadmills to measure reaction force with high accuracy, then measurement precision is improved, but device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereaction forceVSAvoiddevice
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces complex mechanical force sensors with a simple triaxial accelerometer that measures acceleration forces, eliminating the need for expensive treadmills and force measurement systems while providing equivalent or superior data

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Measurement precision

If accelerometers are placed on the shoe to track foot trajectory, then measurement precision of foot movement is improved, but reliability of stride analysis decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefoot trajectoryVSAvoidstride analysis
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of placing the sensor on the foot to directly measure foot trajectory, the patent inverts the approach by placing the sensor on the torso near the center of gravity, where it can reliably measure body movement and infer stride characteristics through acceleration patterns

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

4Ease of operation

If wristwatches with inertial sensors are used to evaluate distance and calories, then ease of operation is improved, but measurement precision of stride analysis decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovedeviceVSAvoidstride analysis
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by placing the accelerometer specifically on the torso near the center of gravity, where the sensor captures the most relevant biomechanical data for stride analysis, rather than using a generic wrist-mounted sensor

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

5Measurement precision

If multiple sensors are distributed on the athlete's body to analyze movement trajectory, then measurement precision is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemovement trajectoryVSAvoiddevice
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the functions of multiple sensors into a single triaxial accelerometer placed on the torso, combining all necessary measurement capabilities (vertical acceleration, horizontal acceleration, asymmetry detection) in one device rather than distributing sensors throughout the body

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The device provides accurate, real-time analysis of biomechanical parameters, enabling immediate detection of asymmetries and fatigue risks, facilitating personalized training plans and equipment recommendations for enhanced running efficiency and safety.

Implementation Method 1

measuring a sequence of acceleration data in at least the vertical direction using the accelerometer

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAcceleration: Accelerometer

Data Source

PatentUS20250262481A1Integrated portable device and method implementing an accelerometer for detecting asymmetries in a movement of a user
Publication Date: 2025.08.21 SLYDE ANALYTICS LLC
  • US20250262481A1 patent drawing
  • US20250262481A1 patent drawing
  • US20250262481A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method and system for preventing injuries to a runner by analyzing biomechanical asymmetries during a running activity. A wearable device comprising an accelerometer and a digital processor is fastened to the runner to measure acceleration data, including in the vertical, lateral, and anteroposterior directions, over the course of a defined distance. Based on the acceleration data and the motion of the runner's center of gravity, the device calculates an asymmetry of movement, which may reflect differences between limb movements or directional displacements. The calculated asymmetry is displayed on the device, optionally in formats such as radar charts or Kiviat diagrams, and is used to assess performance indicators including balance, mobility, and fatigue. The method further includes classifying runners into different types—e.g., pronators or supinators—and selecting appropriate sport equipment, such as shoes, that enhance running efficiency or protect the musculotendinous system.