Totalizer Selector for Parimutuel Wagering Systems

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Parimutuel wagering systems face challenges in managing complex calculations and distributing wagers efficiently across multiple totalizers, leading to increased computational burdens and potential errors.

Innovation Solution

A parimutuel wagering system comprising multiple totalizers and a totalizer selector that applies criteria to incoming wagers to distribute them seamlessly across available totalizers, based on game, wager, and bettor characteristics, without notifying bettors, thereby optimizing calculations and reducing workload on individual totalizers.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If multiple totalizers are used to handle wagers, then computational capacity and accuracy are improved, but system complexity and wager distribution management increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecalculation accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a totalizer selector as an intermediary component that manages the distribution of wagers to appropriate totalizers. This mediator applies predefined criteria (such as game type, wager characteristics, or totalizer workload) to automatically route wagers, thereby managing the complexity of coordinating multiple totalizers without requiring complex real-time communication protocols between them.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent divides the wagering system into multiple independent totalizers, each capable of handling specific types of wagers or operating independently. This segmentation allows the system to distribute computational load across multiple units, improving both computational capacity and accuracy while maintaining manageable complexity through the selector's systematic routing approach.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Productivity

If wagers are distributed across multiple totalizers, then computational burden on individual totalizers is reduced, but wager distribution management and coordination increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecalculation speedVSAvoiddistribution management
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements preliminary action by establishing predefined criteria and rules for wager distribution before the wagering process begins. The totalizer selector uses these pre-established criteria (such as game type, bet characteristics, or load balancing parameters) to automatically assign wagers to appropriate totalizers, eliminating the need for complex real-time coordination and decision-making during active wagering.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables self-service by allowing totalizers to independently process wagers assigned to them based on their capabilities and current workload. Each totalizer operates autonomously once a wager is assigned, managing its own calculations and state without requiring continuous coordination with other totalizers, thereby reducing distribution management complexity while maintaining high productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Productivity

If criteria-based totalizer selection is implemented, then wager distribution efficiency is improved, but system configuration and criteria management increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewager distribution efficiencyVSAvoidcriteria management
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent utilizes parameter changes by allowing the criteria for totalizer selection to be dynamically adjusted based on system conditions, game types, or operational requirements. The totalizer selector can modify parameters such as workload thresholds, game type mappings, or priority rules to optimize wager distribution efficiency without requiring fundamental system reconfiguration, thereby managing complexity through flexible parameter adjustment rather than structural changes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20250014426A1Wagering systems and methods with criteria-based totalizer selection, and totalizer selector device
Publication Date: 2025.01.09 CASTLE ISLAND IP HOLDING LLC
  • US20250014426A1 patent drawing
  • US20250014426A1 patent drawing
  • US20250014426A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A totalizer selector for a parimutuel or pot-based wagering system is provided. The wagering system includes first totalizer configured to perform parimutuel calculations according to a first pool, a second totalizer configured to perform parimutuel calculations according to a second pool, and one or more wagering terminals. The totalizer is configured to communicate with the one or more wagering terminals, the first totalizer, the second totalizer, or another device having information regarding criteria to be used in totalizer selection, the totalizer selector is configured to apply the one or more rules to a criteria and select the first totalizer or the second totalizer for a wagering event presented by the one or more wagering terminal, and output an indication of the selected first totalizer or the second totalizer to the one or more wagering terminals, the first totalizer, or the second totalizer.