Non-symmetrical Totem Pole Rectifier for Switching Loss Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional totem pole rectifier circuits face challenges such as high switching losses, low power density, circulating energy, total harmonic distortion, and electromagnetic compatibility issues due to their limitations in efficiency and design, particularly at light loads and varying AC voltage conditions.

Innovation Solution

A hybrid diode-less power converter topology with a non-symmetrical arrangement of rectifying and shaping switches, where the shaping switches operate in Continuous Conduction Mode with high-speed HEMT and low voltage MOSFET cascode configuration, and rectifying switches have controlled commutation times to minimize energy circulation and harmonic distortion, achieving efficient power conversion.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of energy

If conventional totem pole rectifier circuits are used, then the circuit structure is simple and compact, but switching losses are high and efficiency is limited particularly at light loads

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveswitching lossesVSAvoidcircuit structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs asymmetrical switching patterns where the two switching devices operate with different duty cycles and timing. One device switches at a different frequency or phase than the other, creating an asymmetrical operation mode that reduces simultaneous switching events and thereby minimizes switching losses while maintaining the compact bridge-less structure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements dynamic duty cycle adjustment where the switching parameters are varied based on operating conditions such as load level and input voltage. This dynamic control allows the circuit to optimize switching timing and reduce switching losses at light loads while maintaining stable operation across varying conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Loss of energy

If BCM control method is used to reduce reverse recovery current, then switching losses decrease, but power handling capability and power density are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereverse recovery lossesVSAvoidpower handling capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSPower

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses continuous dynamic adjustment of switching parameters including duty cycle and switching frequency to maintain CCM operation while optimizing for reduced reverse recovery effects. The control system dynamically adapts switching timing based on instantaneous operating conditions, enabling high power handling without the power density penalty of fixed BCM control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback control mechanisms that monitor inductor current, switching states, and operating conditions to continuously adjust switching parameters. This feedback enables the system to maintain optimal switching timing that prevents reverse recovery current while preserving high power handling capability through real-time parameter optimization

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Loss of energy

If fast switching devices are used to increase switching speed, then efficiency improves, but electromagnetic compatibility issues and harmonic distortion increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveefficiencyVSAvoidelectromagnetic compatibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs periodic switching patterns with carefully designed switching frequencies and duty cycles that create predictable electromagnetic interference spectra. By using regular periodic switching rather than irregular fast switching, the EMI can be more effectively filtered and managed while maintaining high efficiency through optimized switching timing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent adjusts switching parameters such as rise time, fall time, and switching frequency to optimize the balance between efficiency and EMI. By controlling the rate of change of voltage and current during switching transitions, the patent reduces high-frequency harmonic content and electromagnetic radiation while maintaining low conduction losses through efficient switching operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Power

If CCM control method is used to provide high power handling capability, then power density increases, but switching losses and reverse recovery current increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower handling capabilityVSAvoidswitching losses
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses asymmetrical switching patterns in CCM operation where the two switching devices operate with different duty cycles. This asymmetry allows one device to handle the bulk of the power transfer while the other operates with reduced switching stress, thereby maintaining high power handling capability while reducing overall switching losses compared to symmetrical CCM operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Data Source

PatentUS9166498B2Power converter with non-symmetrical totem pole rectifier and current-shaping branch circuits
Publication Date: 2015.10.20 BEL POWER SOLUTIONS INC
  • US9166498B2 patent drawing
  • US9166498B2 patent drawing
  • US9166498B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A hybrid diode-less power converter topology of the present invention converts power from an AC power source to a variable load with high efficiency. The power converter includes a non-symmetrical arrangement of rectifying switches for rectifying an input AC voltage and shaping switches for shaping an input AC current. The shaping switches are operated in Continuous Conduction Mode (CCM) based on an input AC current. Operation of each of the rectifying switches and shaping switches are further controlled wherein a commutation time for the shaping switches is associated with a first voltage rise and fall time (e.g., less than 10 ns), and a commutation time for the rectifying switches is associated with a second voltage rise and fall time (e.g., at least 100 ns), wherein the first voltage rise and fall time is less than the second voltage rise and fall time by a factor of nine or more.