Integrated Touch Detector Code Debugger Design

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing touch detectors with code debuggers are bulky, inconvenient to carry, complex to operate, and require opening the device to replace batteries, with compatibility issues when used with different brands and lack online debugging functionality.

Innovation Solution

A compact touch detector design with a integrated code debugger featuring a thin, flat structure, accessible components, and a rechargeable battery, including a microcontroller, LCD driver, CPU, sensors, and a USB port for online debugging, allowing for easy battery replacement and compatibility with various brands.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a traditional box-type code debugger is used, then debugging functionality is provided, but the device volume is large and inconvenient to carry

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveportabilityVSAvoiddevice volume
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSVolume of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines the code debugger functionality directly into the touch detector device, merging two separate functions into one integrated unit. This eliminates the need for a separate box-type debugger while maintaining all debugging capabilities, thereby reducing overall device volume and improving portability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The touch detector device is designed to perform multiple functions: it serves as both a touch detection device and a code debugger. This multi-functionality allows the device to replace traditional separate debugging tools, reducing the need for multiple devices and improving portability without sacrificing debugging functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Ease of operation

If a traditional code debugger with keyboard is used, then debugging operations can be performed, but the operation complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperation simplicityVSAvoidinterface complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes the complex keyboard interface from the debugger and extracts only the essential debugging functionality. By eliminating unnecessary components like physical keyboards and complex display interfaces, the device achieves simpler operation while maintaining core debugging capabilities through a streamlined user interface.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The debugger is designed to work automatically with the touch detector, requiring minimal user intervention. The system self-configures and self-debugS based on the integrated hardware architecture, reducing the complexity of operation compared to traditional debuggers that require manual configuration and complex command inputs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Ease of repair

If a sealed device structure is used, then protection is improved, but battery replacement becomes difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebattery accessibilityVSAvoiddevice sealing
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of repairVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The device is segmented into modular components, with the battery compartment designed as a separate accessible section. This segmentation allows the battery to be easily replaced without compromising the overall sealed structure of the device, maintaining both ease of repair and device reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The device structure incorporates dynamic accessibility features that allow the battery compartment to be opened or accessed when needed, while maintaining a sealed protective structure during normal operation. This dynamic design enables easy battery replacement while preserving the protective sealing when the compartment is closed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Adaptability or versatility

If a dedicated debugger device is used, then debugging functionality is provided, but compatibility with different device brands is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebrand compatibilityVSAvoidsystem integration
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The touch detector device is designed with universal compatibility features that allow it to function as a code debugger for multiple different device brands and models. By integrating standardized debugging interfaces and protocols, the device achieves broad adaptability without requiring separate dedicated debugger devices for each brand.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The integrated debugger acts as an intermediary between the touch detector and various external devices from different brands. It provides a universal interface layer that translates between different brand protocols and the core debugging functionality, enabling compatibility across multiple platforms while maintaining a unified system architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS10318070B2Touch detector with a code debugger
Publication Date: 2019.06.11 HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC
  • US10318070B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A touch detector with a code debugger is provided. The touch detector can include a base, a PCBA with a base-side of the PCBA mounted to the base, a frame mounted to a frame-side of the PCBA, and a debugging device mounted on, coupled to, or soldered to the PCBA for debugging other components soldered to the PCBA. The debugging device can be externally accessible to a user when the base, the PCBA, and the frame are mounted together. The touch detector can also include a battery and/or a USB port, each of which can be externally accessible to the user when the base, the PCBA, and the frame are mounted together.