Touch Display Sensor Grouping for Response Speed

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Large display systems with touch interfaces face inefficiencies in scan time due to uniform touch sensing cycles across multiple sensors, leading to prolonged refreshing timing and decreased response speed.

Innovation Solution

A method and apparatus that differentiate touch sensing cycles for sensors based on overlapping application regions and their display rankings, adjusting scan periods to optimize sensor operations and reduce unnecessary sensing tasks.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If uniform touch sensing cycles are applied to all sensors in large display systems, then the system structure is simple and easy to control, but the scan time increases and response speed decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol structureVSAvoidscan time
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the touch sensing operation by dividing sensors into multiple groups that operate with different sensing cycles. Instead of uniformly scanning all sensors at the same rate, the system creates first, second, and third sensor groups with progressively longer sensing cycles, thereby reducing the overall scan time while maintaining comprehensive touch detection coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements dynamic sensing cycles where different sensor groups operate at different rates adaptively. The control apparatus dynamically assigns shorter sensing cycles to certain sensor groups and longer cycles to others based on their positions and detection priorities, optimizing the balance between response speed and power consumption in real-time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Ease of operation

If all sensors perform sensing operations at the same cycle, then the control method is simple, but the response speed of the touch display device decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol methodVSAvoidresponse speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments sensors into multiple operational groups with different sensing frequencies. First sensor groups scan at a higher frequency while second and third groups scan at lower frequencies, creating a hierarchical sensing structure that improves overall response speed without requiring complex individual control of each sensor.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by assigning different sensing cycle characteristics to different sensor groups based on their functional requirements. Certain regions of the display utilize faster sensing cycles for critical touch detection areas, while other regions use slower cycles, optimizing both response speed and operational simplicity through localized sensing strategies.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Area of stationary object

If the number of sensors is increased to cover larger display areas, then the coverage area increases, but the average scan period increases and response speed decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoverage areaVSAvoidaverage scan period
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the large display area into multiple sensor groups that operate independently with different sensing cycles. This segmentation allows the system to maintain comprehensive coverage of large areas while reducing the average scan period by not requiring all sensors to complete full scanning cycles at the same rate.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements periodic action with varying periods across different sensor groups. By establishing multiple sensing cycles with different frequencies (first cycle, second cycle, third cycle), the system maintains continuous touch detection across large display areas while the alternating periodic patterns reduce the overall average scan time compared to uniform scanning of all sensors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Data Source

PatentEP3678013B1Device and method for controlling touch display, and touch display system
Publication Date: 2023.07.26 SK TELECOM CO LTD
  • EP3678013B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3678013B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3678013B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4

AI summary

A method in accordance with an embodiment is performed by a control apparatus. The method includes obtaining, when applications having a region within which the applications are overlapped with each other are displayed on the touch display device, information that one application of the applications is displayed to cover the other application of the applications or that said one application is displayed to be covered by the other application within the region; determining, based on the obtained information, touch sensing cycles for touch sensors among a plurality of touch sensors embedded in the touch display device to be different from each other, each of said at least two touch sensors sensing a corresponding part within an entire region where the applications are displayed on the touch display device; and controlling each of said at least two touch sensors to perform a sensing operation based on its touch sensing cycle.