Touch Display Control Layout Based on Vehicle User Position

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing touch-sensitive display systems in vehicles often fail to optimally arrange control areas for multiple users, leading to discomfort and inefficient use of screen space, as some users may struggle to reach or operate necessary functions.

Innovation Solution

A method that determines the relative position of users in relation to the display device and assigns and arranges control areas based on user position, adapting their size and visibility to user needs and permissions, using existing vehicle sensors like cameras and seat occupancy sensors.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If control areas are arranged in a fixed layout on the display, then the display structure is simple and easy to manufacture, but users at different positions cannot comfortably access all control areas

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveAccessibility of control areasVSAvoidDisplay control system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control area arrangement is made dynamic rather than static. The system continuously determines user positions using sensor data (camera, seat sensors) and automatically rearranges control areas on the display in real-time. This dynamic adaptation ensures that control areas are always positioned within comfortable reach of the current user, resolving the contradiction between ease of operation and device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

Different control areas are assigned to different spatial zones on the display based on user position. The system identifies which user is seated where and presents relevant control areas in their local field of view and reach zone. This local quality approach ensures each user sees and can access the control areas most relevant to their position, improving accessibility without requiring a completely complex system redesign.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Adaptability or versatility

If the display shows all control areas for all possible functions, then all functions are accessible, but screen space is wasted and energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveFunction accessibilityVSAvoidDisplay energy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts and displays only the control areas that are relevant to the current user's position and needs, rather than showing all possible control areas. By using sensor data to determine which user is seated where, the system selectively presents only the necessary control functions, reducing screen content while maintaining full functionality. This extraction principle reduces energy consumption by displaying fewer elements while preserving adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameter of display content based on user position. When a user is detected in a specific seat, the display parameters (which control areas are shown, their size, and position) are adjusted to match that user's needs. This parameter change approach allows the same display hardware to serve multiple users efficiently, reducing energy waste by not continuously displaying all possible control areas.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of operation

If control areas are made larger for easier operation, then ease of operation improves, but fewer control areas can be displayed on the screen

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveControl area operabilityVSAvoidScreen space utilization
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The size of control areas is made dynamic rather than fixed. The system adjusts control area dimensions based on the current user's position, reach capability, and the number of relevant control functions needed. When fewer control areas are needed, they can be displayed larger for easier operation. When more control areas are needed, the system can display them in a grid layout with smaller individual areas. This dynamic sizing resolves the contradiction between operability and screen space utilization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS20260093394A1Method for Operating a Touch-Sensitive Display Device
Publication Date: 2026.04.02 BAYERISCHE MOTOREN WERKE AG
  • US20260093394A1 patent drawing
  • US20260093394A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method operates a touch-sensitive display device designed for displaying at least two control areas. The method includes determining at least one relative position of at least a first user of a set of users comprising one or more users in relation to the display device. The method also includes assigning at least one of the at least two control areas to the first user. The method further includes arranging the at least two control areas on the display device on the basis of the assignment to the first user and the relative position of the first user in relation to the display device.