Touch Display Interface for Casino Wager Recognition

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current table games in casinos face challenges in accurately monitoring player wagers, detecting fraud, and providing engaging experiences due to limitations in existing electronic systems, which affect the efficiency of comping players and the overall gaming experience.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a touch display interface that configures virtual buttons with sensory feedback, allowing users to interact with virtual button panels, combine functions, and provide haptic feedback, enabling a hybrid gaming experience combining physical and virtual elements.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If manual monitoring of player wagers is used, then player engagement and personal service are improved, but monitoring accuracy and efficiency deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveplayer service qualityVSAvoidwager monitoring accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual visual monitoring by pit bosses with electronic camera-based wager recognition systems. Cameras capture images of wagers on the table, and image processing algorithms automatically identify and track wager amounts, player positions, and game states, eliminating the need for manual monitoring while improving accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary electronic system consisting of cameras, image processing software, and computer hardware that mediates between the physical wagering activity and the monitoring function. This intermediary system automatically processes wager information and provides data to the casino management system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If electronic wager recognition systems are implemented, then monitoring accuracy is improved, but system complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewager detection accuracyVSAvoidelectronic system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent designs the electronic system to perform multiple functions: wager recognition, player tracking, game state monitoring, and fraud detection. The same camera system and image processing algorithms handle various game types and table configurations, reducing the need for specialized equipment for each function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses digital copies (images) of physical wagers captured by cameras instead of requiring direct physical interaction with or complex sensing of the wager objects. The image processing system creates digital representations of wagers that can be analyzed algorithmically, simplifying the detection process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Device complexity

If traditional camera systems are used for wager recognition, then system simplicity is maintained, but detection speed and accuracy deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem simplicityVSAvoidwager detection speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements periodic capture of wager images at specific intervals during the game cycle, focusing computational resources on capturing and processing images only when wagers are placed or changed, rather than continuous monitoring. This reduces processing load while maintaining detection speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts only the critical information needed for wager recognition from the captured images, using image processing algorithms to identify and isolate wager elements from the rest of the table scene, reducing processing complexity and improving detection speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

4Device complexity

If manual comping processes are used, then system simplicity is maintained, but comping accuracy and player satisfaction deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomping system simplicityVSAvoidcomping accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback loop where the electronic wager recognition system continuously monitors player activity and automatically updates comping decisions based on real-time data. The system compares actual wager amounts against expected values and adjusts comping accordingly, providing continuous feedback to improve accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent enables the comping system to automatically determine and award comps based on electronic monitoring data without requiring manual intervention from pit bosses. The system self-manages the comping process by analyzing wager patterns and automatically crediting player accounts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS8992323B2Gesture enhanced input device
Publication Date: 2015.03.31 LNW GAMING INC
  • US8992323B2 patent drawing
  • US8992323B2 patent drawing
  • US8992323B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Various embodiments disclosed herein are directed to a virtual player interface such as button deck for a gaming device. The interface includes a touch screed display which displays one or more button icons. The size, shape and location of the button icons may be reconfigured based upon player interaction or selection. Button functions or selections may be combined into a single button. The button reconfiguration may be saved to a player account to be applied when the player uses the gaming device or other applicable device. Haptic or audible feedback may be applied to the button icon based upon the location of the player's touch relative to a target position on the icon.