Touch Input Surface with Rotating Carriage for Stable Haptic Feedback

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional touch-sensitive input devices with haptic feedback are not optimal as they can convey an unsteady perception to users due to tilting or instability when tapped.

Innovation Solution

A touch-sensitive input device with a stiff and robust design, where the input surface is movably disposed on a carriage that can rotate about a perpendicular axis, equipped with pressure sensors to detect forces and produce haptic feedback without tilting, using an electromechanical actuator for controlled movement and non-displacement sensors like strain gauges for accurate force detection.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If the input surface is made stiff and robust to improve quality perception, then the haptic feedback quality is improved, but the ability to detect user inputs through tilting movement is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestiffness and robustness of input surfaceVSAvoiddetection of user input through tilting
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

A carriage is introduced as an intermediary component between the input surface and the support structure. The carriage can rotate about a rotation axis and carries the pressure sensor, enabling force detection without requiring the input surface itself to tilt or deform significantly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The detection mechanism is replaced from direct tilting detection to pressure sensing. Instead of detecting tilting movements of the input surface, a pressure sensor mounted on the carriage detects forces perpendicular to the input surface, eliminating the need for the input surface to be flexible or tiltable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Ease of operation

If the input surface is made movable to produce haptic feedback, then the haptic feedback capability is improved, but the stability and robustness perception deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehaptic feedback capabilityVSAvoidstability and robustness perception
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The system is segmented into distinct functional components: the input surface remains fixed and stable, while the carriage with pressure sensor and actuator assembly is separated as a movable unit. This segmentation allows the input surface to maintain its stable, robust appearance while the actuator produces haptic feedback through controlled movement of the carriage assembly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The carriage acts as an intermediary that decouples the input surface from the actuator mechanism. The input surface stays stationary and stable, while the carriage moves to produce haptic feedback, eliminating the perception of instability that would occur if the input surface itself had to move.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Measurement precision

If pressure sensors are used to detect force perpendicular to the input surface, then the measurement precision of user input is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveforce detection precisionVSAvoidstructural complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The carriage serves multiple functions: it supports the pressure sensor for force detection, provides a mounting platform for the actuator, and acts as a lever arm to amplify small forces. This multi-functionality reduces the need for additional separate components, thereby limiting the increase in device complexity despite the enhanced measurement precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The device provides a high-quality haptic feedback experience by detecting and responding to user inputs with a 'click' sensation, ensuring the input surface feels stable and robust, enhancing user interaction with precise force detection and reduced wear on sensors.

Implementation Method 1

at least one pressure sensor or force sensor, which in the form of a non-displacement sensor, in particular in the form of a strain gauge, is disposed on the carriage

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectStrain gauge measurement: Piezoresistive Effect

Implementation Method 2

an electromechanical actuator for moving the input surface back and forth along its axis of motion, thereby producing the haptically detectable feedback

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic actuation: Electromagnetic Induction

Data Source

PatentUS9182825B2Input device comprising a touch-sensitive input surface
Publication Date: 2015.11.10 AUDI AG
  • US9182825B2 patent drawing
  • US9182825B2 patent drawing
  • US9182825B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Input device has a touch sensitive input surface with a sensor for detecting the position of an object touching the input surface, an interface for transferring sensor data and a device for producing haptically detectable feedback, which is designed to move the input surface, which is mounted so as to be movable along an axis.