Touch Interface Deletion Feedback Mechanism

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for deleting user interface objects on touch-sensitive devices are cumbersome and inefficient, often requiring multiple steps and risking accidental deletion due to the complexity of the interaction process.

Innovation Solution

A method that utilizes a combination of visual, audible, and tactile feedback mechanisms to simplify the deletion process by providing initial feedback upon prolonged touch, increasing feedback intensity, and confirming deletion with a final feedback signal, allowing for gradual removal of the object from the interface.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If existing deletion methods are used to prevent erroneous deletion, then deletion safety is improved, but the number of interaction steps increases and efficiency deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedeletion safetyVSAvoiddeletion efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where the system provides visual feedback (highlighting the object) and haptic feedback (vibration patterns) to the user during the deletion process. The vibration intensity and pattern change based on the duration of the touch input, providing real-time feedback about the deletion state without requiring additional interaction steps, thus maintaining safety while improving efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary actions by automatically highlighting the target object and providing initial vibration feedback as soon as the touch input is detected. This preliminary feedback prepares the user for the upcoming deletion without requiring separate confirmation steps, reducing the total interaction time while maintaining safety through progressive feedback.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Measurement precision

If multiple interaction steps are required for deletion, then accuracy of deletion intent is improved, but cognitive burden increases and user experience deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedeletion intent accuracyVSAvoiduser experience
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts the vibration feedback characteristics based on the duration of the touch input. During the first time period, a first vibration pattern is provided, and during the second time period, a second vibration pattern with different intensity or pattern is provided. This dynamic feedback helps users understand the deletion progress and intent accuracy without requiring multiple discrete interaction steps.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The deletion process maintains continuous useful action by providing uninterrupted haptic and visual feedback throughout the entire deletion sequence. The feedback continues from the initial touch through the deletion confirmation, eliminating gaps where users might lose track of the deletion state, thereby improving both accuracy and ease of operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

3Loss of information

If feedback intensity is increased to signal forthcoming deletion, then user awareness is improved, but potential for user distraction or anxiety increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser awarenessVSAvoiduser distraction
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses periodic vibration patterns to provide feedback about the deletion process. The vibration occurs in controlled intervals during the touch duration, providing sufficient awareness without continuous intense stimulation. This periodic feedback maintains user awareness while avoiding excessive distraction or anxiety.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes vibration parameters (intensity, frequency, pattern) based on the deletion stage and user interaction duration. During the first time period, one set of vibration parameters is used, and during the second time period, different parameters are applied to signal the forthcoming deletion. This parameter adjustment provides necessary awareness while minimizing harmful distraction effects.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS10956005B2Device, method and graphical user interface for deleting an object in a user interface
Publication Date: 2021.03.23 PAYPAL INC
  • US10956005B2 patent drawing
  • US10956005B2 patent drawing
  • US10956005B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The disclosure generally relates to the field of graphical user interfaces and particular it relates to a method of deleting a graphical user interface object, and to a corresponding electronic device and computer program. In particular the disclosure relates to a method, at an electronic device with a touch display and at least one user feedback mechanism for deleting a user interface object, wherein user feedback is provided, in response to the, facilitated by one of the at least one of the user feedback mechanisms.