Touch Interface Tool Detection for Input Adaptation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional handheld devices face inefficiencies due to limited hot keys and inadequate user interface design, requiring users to navigate extensive menus for function activation, and lack differentiation in input tool handling between fingers and styluses, leading to inconvenient and error-prone operations.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that identifies the type of input tool (finger or stylus) through contact area and pressure analysis, allowing the user interface to switch between different operation mechanisms, enabling more efficient and intuitive interactions by adapting the interface based on the input tool used.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of time

If hot keys are installed on the casing or keyboard for quick function activation, then the activation speed of frequently used functions is improved, but the device weight and volume increase and aesthetic design is compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefunction activation timeVSAvoiddevice weight
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the display surface and touch sensor into an integrated touch display panel, eliminating the need for separate physical hot keys. The display panel itself serves as both the visual interface and the input surface, allowing quick function activation through touch gestures on the display area without adding physical buttons that would increase weight and volume.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The touch display panel serves multiple functions: it displays information, receives input gestures, and acts as the activation surface for frequently used functions. This multi-functional approach replaces dedicated physical hot keys with a universal touch interface that provides the same quick activation capability without the physical overhead.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Shape

If the number of hot keys is limited to maintain aesthetic design, then the device appearance is improved, but the number of quickly accessible functions is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice appearanceVSAvoidnumber of accessible functions
Core Design Contradiction:
ShapeVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions from a one-dimensional linear arrangement of physical hot keys to a two-dimensional touch display interface. This dimensional expansion allows multiple function activations to be distributed across the display area, enabling access to many more functions simultaneously while maintaining a clean, uninterrupted display surface that preserves aesthetic design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The touch display interface dynamically adapts to show different functions and interfaces based on user interaction. The same physical space can display different sets of functions at different times, providing versatile access to numerous functions without requiring permanent physical buttons for each one, thus maintaining aesthetic appearance while increasing functional adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Device complexity

If the menu is displayed on the touch sensor for function selection, then the device structure is simplified, but the operation time increases due to extensive menu navigation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice structureVSAvoidmenu navigation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feature where frequently used functions are pre-configured and can be quickly accessed through specific touch gestures or shortcuts on the display. This preliminary arrangement of common functions in easily accessible locations reduces the need for extensive menu navigation, allowing users to activate frequent functions rapidly while maintaining the simplified menu display structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The touch interface allows users to skip through menu layers more efficiently using gesture-based navigation. Instead of requiring sequential selection through multiple menu levels, the system enables faster traversal of menu structures through swipe gestures and direct selection capabilities, reducing navigation time while keeping the overall menu display structure simple.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #21Skipping (Rushing through)

4Device complexity

If the same user interface is used for both finger and stylus input, then the interface design is simplified, but the precision and convenience for different input tools are compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinterface design complexityVSAvoidinput convenience
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements different interface behaviors and parameters based on the detected input tool. When a stylus is detected, the interface enables finer selection precision, smaller selection margins, and more precise cursor control. When a finger is detected, the interface adjusts to provide larger touch targets and more forgiving selection margins. This local adaptation of interface quality to the specific input tool enhances ease of operation for each tool type while maintaining a unified underlying interface design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentEP1993030B1Method for browsing a user interface for an electronic device and the software thereof
Publication Date: 2013.06.12 HTC CORP
  • EP1993030B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP1993030B1 patent drawingFigure 2A~2D
  • EP1993030B1 patent drawingFigure 3A~3B

AI summary

A method for browsing a user interface for an electronic device and the software thereof are provided. A processor in the electronic device receives an input signal through a touch sensor. Then the processing unit determines the type of the input tool which generates the input signal. Finally, a user interface browsing function is enabled or disabled automatically according to the tool type. As a result, the convenience of operating the electronic device is increased.