Touch Panel Controller Dynamic Bend Correction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing touch sensor systems face challenges in accurately detecting input positions on touch panels due to external factors like panel bending, which can cause capacitance changes that are similar in magnitude to those from user inputs, leading to degraded detection accuracy.

Innovation Solution

A touch panel controller that generates a second signal value map by performing correction calculations on a broader area than the input operation range, canceling out changes caused by external factors such as panel bending, using an area configuration unit, average value calculation unit, inclination calculation unit, and correction calculation unit to generate a corrected capacitance map.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If calibration is performed to correct static bend influence, then detection accuracy is improved under static conditions, but detection accuracy degrades when dynamic bend occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinput position detection accuracyVSAvoiddetection accuracy under dynamic bend
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions from static calibration to dynamic correction by continuously monitoring capacitance changes and adapting correction values in real-time. The system detects temporal changes in capacitance distribution and adjusts correction algorithms dynamically to account for changing bend conditions, thereby maintaining detection accuracy under both static and dynamic bend scenarios.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter being corrected from fixed calibration values to dynamic correction values that adapt to changing bend conditions. By monitoring temporal changes in capacitance distribution and adjusting correction parameters accordingly, the system maintains accuracy under varying dynamic conditions while preserving the benefits of calibration for static conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If correction calculation is performed on a small area, then processing speed is improved, but correction accuracy degrades for broader external factor influences

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecorrection processing speedVSAvoidcorrection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the touch panel area into multiple regions and performs correction calculations for each region independently. This segmentation allows the system to process smaller areas in parallel, improving processing speed while ensuring that local variations in capacitance distribution are accurately corrected. The segmented approach maintains computational efficiency while achieving comprehensive correction coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Measurement precision

If the area for correction calculation is expanded to broader range, then correction accuracy for external factors is improved, but processing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecorrection accuracy for external factorsVSAvoidcorrection calculation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies correction calculations to areas broader than the immediate input region, using excessive action to ensure all external factor influences are captured. By extending the correction area beyond the minimal necessary region, the system ensures comprehensive correction of external factors like bend and electromagnetic waves, while managing complexity through efficient algorithms that handle the expanded scope.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Effectively removes the influence of external factors, enabling accurate detection of input positions even when the touch panel is dynamically bending, by maintaining signal values at input positions while reducing them in non-input areas.

Implementation Method 1

In a capacitance type touch sensor system, a change in capacitance (signal value) in the touch panel, which is caused by the contact of the finger of the user or the touch stylus with the touch panel, is detected.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCapacitance: Capacitance

Implementation Method 2

a second signal value map generation unit that configures an area that is a broader range than a range where changes in the signal values due to an input operation on the touch panel occur on the first signal value map and generates a second signal value map by performing correction calculation which cancels changes in the signal values due to external factors different from the input operation on the touch panel in the area

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCorrection calculation:

Data Source

PatentUS9489083B2Touch panel controller, touch sensor system, and electronic device
Publication Date: 2016.11.08 WACOM CO LTD
  • US9489083B2 patent drawing
  • US9489083B2 patent drawing
  • US9489083B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A touch panel controller (1) includes a first capacitance distribution calculation unit (15) that outputs a first signal value map which indicates a distribution of signal values in a touch panel (10) and a first capacitance distribution correction unit (16) that configures a broader area than an area in which changes in the signal values due to an input operation on the touch panel occur on the first signal value map, performs correction calculation that cancels the changes in the signal values due to external factors which are different from the input operation on the touch panel in the region, and generates a second signal value map.