Touch Panel Driver Signal Edge Separation for EMI Suppression

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Touch panels experience deteriorated detection performance due to electromagnetic interference (EMI) caused by the driving signals applied to the electrodes and driving circuits.

Innovation Solution

The method involves a touch detection device with a panel of regularly arranged electrodes, a connector to form sensing channels, and a driver that outputs driving signals with different edges to different sensing channels, as well as a main controller that controls drivers to start input sensing at different times to prevent synchronization of signal edges.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If driving signals are applied to electrodes to enable touch detection, then touch detection function is achieved, but electromagnetic interference (EMI) affects electrodes and driving circuits, deteriorating detection performance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection performanceVSAvoidEMI effect
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies periodic action by alternating the polarity of driving signals applied to different sensing channels in a systematic sequence. The driver alternates between positive and negative voltage levels in a periodic manner, ensuring that adjacent sensing channels receive opposite polarity signals at any given time. This periodic polarity alternation creates opposing electromagnetic fields that cancel each other out, reducing EMI effects while maintaining continuous touch detection capability across all channels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

2Productivity

If driving signals with synchronized edges are applied to multiple sensing channels, then efficient parallel detection is achieved, but EMI effect is enhanced due to simultaneous edge transitions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection efficiencyVSAvoidEMI effect
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies asymmetry by intentionally creating asymmetric timing relationships between driving signals applied to different sensing channels. Instead of applying identical synchronized signals to all channels, the driver offsets the phase and polarity of signals across different channels, ensuring that edge transitions occur at different times. This asymmetric signal distribution prevents simultaneous edge transitions that would otherwise constructively interfere and generate strong EMI, while still enabling parallel detection operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach effectively suppresses the EMI effect, improving the detection performance of touch panels by minimizing electromagnetic interference between the electrodes and driving circuits.

Implementation Method 1

there is a problem in that EMI formed by the driving signal affects the plurality of electrodes and/or a plurality of driving circuits in the panel

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic interference (EMI): Electromagnetic Induction

Data Source

PatentUS12307049B2Method of driving touch panel for suppressing emi effect
Publication Date: 2025.05.20 G2TOUCH CO LTD
  • US12307049B2 patent drawing
  • US12307049B2 patent drawing
  • US12307049B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A touch detection device includes a panel including a plurality of electrodes regularly arranged in rows and columns, a connector configured to electrically connect some of the electrodes to form a plurality of sensing channels, and a driver configured to provide driving signals to the sensing channels, wherein the driver parts different edges of the driving signals to different sensing channels.