Touch Panel Failure Detection via Statistical Sensitivity Adjustment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing input interface devices, such as touch panels, face challenges in detecting failures due to sensitivity issues, where high sensitivity can lead to false touch detection and low sensitivity can result in missed touches, making it difficult to determine abnormal states accurately.

Innovation Solution

A failure detection device and method that utilize a controller to acquire position information, calculate determination counts, and adjust touch sensitivity based on statistical analysis of touch data to determine if an input interface device is in an abnormal state, thereby correcting sensitivity issues.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If high sensitivity is set for touch detection, then touch responsiveness is improved, but false touch detection occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetouch detection sensitivityVSAvoidfalse touch detection
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by making the sensitivity threshold adjustable and adaptive rather than fixed. The controller dynamically adjusts the determination threshold for touch detection based on statistical analysis of touch position data, allowing the system to optimize between responsiveness and false detection prevention under different operating conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter of sensitivity threshold from a fixed value to a dynamically adjustable parameter. By modifying the determination threshold based on statistical characteristics of touch data (such as standard deviation of touch positions), the system can adapt the sensitivity level to prevent false detections while maintaining accurate touch response

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Object-generated harmful factors

If low sensitivity is set for touch detection, then false touch detection is reduced, but missed touches occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefalse touch detectionVSAvoidtouch detection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback by continuously monitoring touch position data and using statistical analysis to adjust the determination threshold. The system feeds back the statistical characteristics (mean, standard deviation) of touch positions to dynamically modify the sensitivity threshold, ensuring that the threshold adapts to maintain both false detection prevention and accurate touch detection

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts the sensitivity threshold based on real-time statistical analysis of touch data rather than using a fixed threshold. This dynamic adjustment allows the system to respond to changing touch patterns and maintain optimal detection accuracy while preventing false detections

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Device complexity

If fixed sensitivity threshold is used, then device complexity is reduced, but detection accuracy under varying conditions deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethreshold adjustment mechanismVSAvoidfailure detection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies self-service by enabling the system to automatically adjust its own sensitivity threshold based on statistical analysis of its own touch data. The controller performs self-diagnosis and self-calibration by calculating statistical parameters from accumulated touch positions and autonomously modifying the determination threshold without external intervention

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback from statistical analysis of touch position data to automatically adjust the sensitivity threshold. By continuously monitoring the distribution of touch positions and feeding back the statistical characteristics to the threshold setting, the system maintains high detection accuracy across varying operating conditions without requiring complex manual calibration

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS10338741B2Failure detection device and failure detection method for input interface device
Publication Date: 2019.07.02 PANASONIC INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT CO LTD
  • US10338741B2 patent drawing
  • US10338741B2 patent drawing
  • US10338741B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A failure detection device according to the present disclosure is a failure detection device that detects a failure of an input interface device detecting a position on a screen, the position being selected by an input operation. The failure detection device includes a memory, and a controller connectable to the input interface device. The controller acquires position information of a predetermined selected region on a screen, calculates a counted number of determinations that the predetermined selected region is not present on a selected position on the screen, and determines that an input interface device is in an abnormal state in a case where the counted number satisfies a predetermined condition.