Touch Panel Firmware Matching via Mutual Capacitance Testing
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Existing touch panels and touch sensitive processing apparatuses often have manufacturing errors that lead to suboptimal performance, resulting in unnecessary disqualification and increased costs due to incorrect adjustment of touch sensing parameters.
Innovation Solution
A method to determine the applicability of a touch panel to a firmware by calculating a test variance ratio using mutual capacitance sensing and a test conductive object, ensuring the touch panel meets the supported range of touch sensing parameters.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Reliability
If touch sensing parameters are adjusted to make suboptimal touch panels qualified, then touch panel performance is improved, but manufacturing complexity and cost increase
Solution Approach 1:
The patent performs preliminary classification of touch panels into applicable and inapplicable categories before final assembly using a test conductive object and variance ratio calculation. This preliminary action identifies panels that would require parameter adjustment, allowing those panels to be sorted out early and avoiding the complexity of parameter adjustment for panels that are fundamentally incompatible with the firmware
Solution Approach 2:
The patent uses a test conductive object as a standardized copy of a human finger to perform consistent measurements across all touch panels. This copying approach provides a uniform reference for comparison, enabling objective classification without requiring actual human interaction during testing, thus reducing subjectivity and complexity in the evaluation process
2Reliability
If touch panels with manufacturing errors are disqualified, then product quality is maintained, but productivity decreases due to excessive rejection rate
Solution Approach 1:
The patent applies local quality assessment by testing specific RC circuits at different locations on the touch panel rather than evaluating the entire panel globally. By focusing measurements on specific test points with test conductive objects, the method identifies locally acceptable panels that may have minor variations but still function adequately, thereby reducing unnecessary rejection and improving productivity while maintaining quality
Solution Approach 2:
The patent changes the assessment parameter from binary pass/fail to a continuous variance ratio metric. By calculating the ratio between measured capacitance values and reference values, the system creates a graded assessment that distinguishes between acceptable variations and genuine defects. This parameter transformation allows panels with minor manufacturing tolerances to be classified as applicable, increasing productivity without compromising quality
3Measurement precision
If comprehensive testing is performed on all touch panels, then measurement precision is improved, but loss of time increases
Solution Approach 1:
The patent extracts only the essential measurement information needed for classification by using a simplified test conductive object approach. Instead of performing comprehensive multi-point measurements with human interaction, the system extracts critical capacitance data from specific test points using automated conductive objects. This extraction of essential information maintains measurement precision for classification purposes while dramatically reducing testing time
Solution Approach 2:
The patent skips time-consuming steps in the traditional testing process by using pre-calibrated test conductive objects with known characteristics. The system rushes through the measurement phase by directly comparing measured values against reference thresholds without requiring iterative human adjustment or complex multi-stage testing. This skipping of unnecessary steps maintains sufficient measurement precision for classification while minimizing time loss
Applied Scientific Principles
This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.
Function Achieved in This Case
This approach reduces the number of mistakenly disqualified touch panels, allowing them to be paired correctly with processing apparatuses, thereby decreasing defects and manufacturing costs.
Implementation Method 1
obtaining a first signal value of a RC (resistance-capacitance) circuit corresponding to a reference point on a touch panel by a touch sensitive processing apparatus using mutual capacitance sensing
Data Source
AI summary
A method for determining whether a touch panel is applicable to a firmware is provided. The method comprising: obtaining a first signal value of a RC circuit corresponding to a reference point on a touch panel by a touch sensitive processing apparatus using mutual capacitance sensing; deploying a test conductive object to the reference point and obtaining a second signal value of the RC circuit by the touch sensitive processing apparatus, wherein the test conductive object and the touch sensitive processing apparatus share a common reference voltage; calculating a test variance ratio according to the first and the second signal values; and determining whether the touch panel is applicable to a range of touch sensing parameters supported by a firmware of the touch sensitive processing apparatus according to the test variation value and a first reference value.


