Touch Panel Robot Chamber Control With Projected Targeting

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current robot systems lack intuitive control methods and safety features, making them difficult for users to operate effectively and safely, especially in environments where precise manipulation of objects is required.

Innovation Solution

A robot system with a transparent cover, a touch panel, a camera, and a projector that allows users to input gestures to control a manipulator, enabling intuitive operation and ensuring safety by providing real-time feedback and precise object manipulation through image recognition and gesture-based control.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If a traditional robot control interface is used, then the control system is simple, but the ease of operation deteriorates due to lack of intuitive control

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveintuitive controlVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

A transparent cover with touch panel is introduced as an intermediary between the user and the robot manipulator. The touch panel receives user gestures and the projector provides visual feedback on the chamber floor, mediating the interaction without requiring complex physical controls or direct manipulation of the robot

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The traditional mechanical control interface is replaced with a gesture-based touch interface. Users control the manipulator through gestures on the transparent cover rather than physical buttons, knobs, or direct mechanical manipulation, substituting mechanical control with optical and tactile sensing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If the manipulator operates within an enclosed chamber, then safety is improved, but ease of operation deteriorates due to reduced visibility

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser safetyVSAvoidvisibility and control
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The projector displays visual indicators (such as highlighted areas or color-coded zones) on the chamber floor to indicate the manipulator's position and status. This optical feedback mechanism allows users to see the manipulator's location and operational state through the transparent cover without compromising the enclosed safe environment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #32Color changes

Solution Approach 2:

The control interface is moved to a different dimension - the transparent cover above the chamber rather than controls within or beside the chamber. This spatial repositioning allows users to interact with the system from above while maintaining the enclosed protective environment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Ease of operation

If gesture recognition is implemented on the transparent cover, then ease of operation is improved, but device complexity worsens due to additional sensors and processing

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegesture-based controlVSAvoidsensor and processing requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The transparent cover serves multiple functions: it acts as a protective enclosure, a transparent display surface, and a touch-sensitive gesture input device. By combining these functions into a single component, the system avoids adding separate sensors and processing units that would increase complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Ease of operation

If real-time visual feedback is provided through the projector, then ease of operation is improved, but use of energy worsens

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereal-time feedbackVSAvoidprojector energy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The projector provides visual feedback selectively rather than continuously - activating only when gesture input is detected or when the manipulator is in specific operational states. This periodic operation reduces energy consumption compared to continuous projection while maintaining real-time feedback capability when needed

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Data Source

PatentUS11213956B2Robot system and method for controlling the same
Publication Date: 2022.01.04 LG ELECTRONICS INC
  • US11213956B2 patent drawing
  • US11213956B2 patent drawing
  • US11213956B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Provided is a robot system. The robot system includes a manipulator configured to perform a preset operation on a plurality of objects, a transparent cover configured to define a chamber in which the plurality of objects and the manipulator are accommodated, the transparent cover being provided with a touch panel, a camera installed to face an internal region of the chamber, a projector configured to emit light to one area within the chamber, and a controller configured to control the projector so that the projector emits the light to a target area corresponding to a touch point of the touch panel, recognize a target object disposed in the target area based on image information of the camera, and control the manipulator so that an operation is performed on the target object.