Touch Position Analysis Using Zero-Crossing Segmentation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing touch display technologies face challenges in accurately determining the position of multiple touches, especially when touches are close together, as signal values tend to concentrate and a single threshold cannot differentiate between single and multiple touches, leading to incorrect position judgments.

Innovation Solution

A method and device that analyze sensing information using zero-crossings, allowing for the determination of touch positions even when the number of analyzed positions differs from the number of zero-crossings, by employing a controller to identify positions based on positive and negative thresholds and performing zero-crossing position analysis to accurately detect finger touches.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If a single threshold is used to determine touch positions, then the device complexity is reduced, but the measurement precision deteriorates when multiple touches are close together

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethreshold determination methodVSAvoidtouch position determination accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the touch detection process into multiple stages: first identifying zero-crossing points in the sensing signal, then performing peak detection within segments defined by these zero-crossings. This segmentation allows the system to handle multiple close touches by treating each segment independently, thereby maintaining measurement precision without requiring excessively complex global threshold determination.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary zero-crossing detection before peak detection. By first identifying where the sensing signal crosses zero, the system prepares segmented regions where subsequent peak detection can be performed more accurately. This preliminary action enables better separation of multiple touches that would otherwise be difficult to distinguish with a single threshold approach.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Device complexity

If signal values are used directly for position determination, then the process is simple, but the reliability deteriorates when multiple touches cross each other's paths

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesignal processing methodVSAvoidtouch detection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of directly analyzing peak values in the sensing signal, the patent inverts the approach by first analyzing zero-crossing points and then using these to guide peak detection. This inversion transforms the problem from directly interpreting overlapping signal peaks to using zero-crossings as reliable anchors that define search regions for peaks, thereby improving reliability when touch paths cross.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces zero-crossing points as an intermediary element between the raw sensing signal and the final touch position determination. These zero-crossings serve as mediators that divide the sensing signal into manageable segments, allowing peak detection to proceed more reliably even when multiple touches overlap, thus improving detection accuracy without excessive complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Device complexity

If the number of zero-crossings is used to determine the number of touches, then the measurement is straightforward, but the accuracy deteriorates when the number of touches does not equal the number of zero-crossings

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetouch counting methodVSAvoidtouch number determination accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary zero-crossing detection to establish segmented regions, but does not directly equate the number of zero-crossings with the number of touches. Instead, it uses these segments as search spaces for subsequent peak detection, where actual touch points are identified. This preliminary segmentation without direct equivalence allows accurate touch counting even when the relationship between zero-crossings and touches is not one-to-one.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the sensing signal using zero-crossings but then performs independent peak detection within each segment. This segmentation approach allows the system to handle cases where multiple touches may produce fewer zero-crossings or where single touches may produce multiple zero-crossings, thereby maintaining accurate touch counting by focusing on peak detection within segments rather than simply counting zero-crossings.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS20120013393A1Method and device for analyzing positions
Publication Date: 2012.01.19 EGALAX EMPIA TECH INC
  • US20120013393A1 patent drawing
  • US20120013393A1 patent drawing
  • US20120013393A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The method and device for analyzing position are disclosed. By analyzing sensing information with at least one zero-crossing, each position can be analyzed. The number of analyzed positions may be different from the number of zero-crossings. When the number of analyzed positions is different from the number of zero-crossing, the number of analyzed positions is more than one.