Continuous-Variable Input Element for Touch Pressure Sensitivity Customization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional touch-based computing systems lack flexibility in customizing pressure sensitivity, often requiring complex curves that are unintuitive and limited to expert users, failing to accommodate individual user preferences and input styles.

Innovation Solution

A touch pressure sensitivity system utilizing a continuous-variable input element, such as a slider or dial, to determine an exponential curve function for customizing pressure sensitivity, allowing users to adjust pressure sensitivity behavior through a single input value, thereby generating a customizable pressure sensitivity curve for graphical user interface tools.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conventional complex curves are used for pressure sensitivity customization, then expert users can achieve precise control, but the interface complexity increases and usability deteriorates for general users

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepressure sensitivity control precisionVSAvoidcustomization interface usability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms the complex curve customization into a simple parameter adjustment by using a single exponent value to control the pressure sensitivity behavior. Instead of manipulating complex curves, users only need to adjust one parameter (the exponent in the power function), which fundamentally changes the interaction model from complex graphical manipulation to simple numerical adjustment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts the essential characteristic of pressure sensitivity control from the complex curve manipulation and represents it through a single exponent parameter. This extraction simplifies the customization process by isolating the key control variable while maintaining the ability to achieve diverse pressure sensitivity behaviors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Adaptability or versatility

If multiple parameters are required for pressure sensitivity customization, then fine-grained control is achieved, but the device complexity and user burden increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepressure sensitivity customization flexibilityVSAvoidcustomization interface complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The single exponent parameter serves multiple functions: it controls the overall pressure sensitivity curve shape, adapts to different user preferences, and works across various pressure ranges. This universal parameter replaces what would traditionally require multiple separate controls, achieving versatility through a unified adjustment mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent merges multiple customization controls into a single exponent parameter. Instead of requiring users to adjust multiple independent parameters for different aspects of pressure sensitivity, the system combines these controls into one unified parameter that simultaneously manages all aspects of the pressure sensitivity behavior.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Adaptability or versatility

If conventional touch input settings are provided, then some customization capability is available, but the interface requires complex curve manipulation that limits effective use to expert users only

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetouch input customization capabilityVSAvoidcustomization accessibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent fundamentally changes the customization approach from complex curve manipulation to simple parameter adjustment. By representing pressure sensitivity behavior through a single exponent parameter in a power function, the system makes customization accessible to all users while maintaining the adaptability to achieve diverse input behaviors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system provides intuitive self-service customization where users can directly adjust the exponent parameter to match their natural input style. The simplicity of the interface allows users to independently configure their preferences without requiring expert knowledge or complex graphical manipulation skills.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS11599218B2Customizing a touch input pressure sensitivity via a continuous-variable input element
Publication Date: 2023.03.07 ADOBE INC
  • US11599218B2 patent drawing
  • US11599218B2 patent drawing
  • US11599218B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods, systems, and non-transitory computer readable storage media are disclosed for provide a continuous-variable input element for customizing pressure sensitivity for a touch-based input. For instance, the disclosed system utilizes an input element value corresponding to a position of the continuous-variable input element to determine a plurality of variables of a pressure sensitivity curve. The disclosed system determines an exponent of an exponential curve function and an ending value for the exponential curve function based on the input element value. Additionally, the disclosed systems generates the pressure sensitivity curve utilizing the exponential curve function. The disclosed system uses the pressure sensitivity curve to determine a display output of a graphical user interface tool in response to a pressure of an input.