Touch Sensing System Idle Mode Controller Latency Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The touch sensing system experiences increased latency when transitioning from an idle mode to a normal operation mode due to the idle time, which reduces touch sensitivity and user experience.

Innovation Solution

A touch sensing system that includes a touch sensing circuit, a coordinate calculator, and an idle mode controller, where the idle mode controller compares analog signals from touch sensors with a threshold value to generate an interrupt signal, awakening the coordinate calculator and rapidly converting the system from idle to normal operation mode.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of energy

If the touch sensing system operates in idle mode with extended idle time, then power consumption is reduced, but latency increases when transitioning to normal operation mode

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower consumptionVSAvoidlatency
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The idle mode controller continuously compares analog signals from touch sensors with a threshold value even during idle time, preparing to detect touch inputs before the system transitions to normal operation mode. This preliminary detection action eliminates the latency that would otherwise occur during the idle time period.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The idle mode controller acts as an intermediary component that bridges the idle mode and normal operation mode. It monitors touch sensor signals during idle time and generates interrupt signals to trigger the coordinate calculator, enabling seamless transition without full system activation and thus reducing both power consumption and latency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Loss of energy

If the touch sensing system operates in idle mode with extended idle time, then power consumption is reduced, but touch sensitivity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower consumptionVSAvoidtouch sensitivity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary touch detection by comparing analog signals with threshold values during idle time, maintaining touch sensitivity without requiring the full coordinate calculation process to be active. This allows the system to remain sensitive to touch inputs while consuming minimal power.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The idle mode controller performs only the essential threshold comparison operation during idle time, which is sufficient to detect touch inputs but consumes significantly less power than the full coordinate calculation process. This partial action maintains touch sensitivity while optimizing power consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Loss of time

If the coordinate calculator remains active during idle time to detect touch inputs, then latency is reduced, but power consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovelatencyVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The touch detection function is segmented into two parts: the idle mode controller handles basic analog signal threshold comparison during idle time, while the coordinate calculator handles full coordinate computation only when needed. This segmentation allows latency reduction through continuous monitoring while avoiding the power consumption penalty of keeping the full coordinate calculator active.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The idle mode controller serves as an intermediary that performs light-weight touch detection during idle time and triggers the coordinate calculator only when touch inputs are detected. This intermediary approach reduces latency by maintaining monitoring capability while minimizing power consumption by activating the power-intensive coordinate calculator only when necessary.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS10324567B2Touch sensing system and method of reducing latency thereof
Publication Date: 2019.06.18 LG DISPLAY CO LTD
  • US10324567B2 patent drawing
  • US10324567B2 patent drawing
  • US10324567B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A touch sensing system and a method of reducing latency thereof are disclosed. The touch sensing system includes a touch sensing circuit configured to apply a driving signal to touch sensors, sense voltages of the touch sensors, and output a digital touch raw data; a coordinate calculator configured to analyze the digital touch raw data, and calculate a coordinate information about each of positions of a touch input; and an idle mode controller configured to compare an analog signal received from the touch sensors with a predetermined threshold value, decide whether or not the touch input is generated based on the analog signal, and generate an interrupt signal when the touch input is sensed.