Touch-Sensitive Control Means for Electronic Music Instruments

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Electronic music instruments have limited and non-alterable functionalities for controlling sound signal parameters like pitch and modulation, restricting user flexibility and customization.

Innovation Solution

Incorporating touch-sensitive means, such as dual-touch capable touchstrips, within the electronic music instrument to simulate physical systems, allowing users to alter and assign various modes for parameter control, providing intuitive and flexible control over sound signal parameters.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If traditional hardware control elements (knobs, buttons) are used, then the device structure is simple and reliable, but the functionality is limited and not alterable by the user

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefunctionality alterabilityVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces traditional mechanical control elements (knobs, buttons) with a touch-sensitive means that uses electromagnetic fields to detect user input. This substitution enables programmable and alterable functionalities while maintaining a relatively simple physical structure, as the same touch surface can be reconfigured through software to provide different control modes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The touch-sensitive means serves multiple functions: it can detect pressing gestures, sliding gestures, and hovering gestures, and can be programmed to control different parameters (pitch, modulation, etc.) in different modes. This universal control interface replaces what would traditionally require multiple dedicated hardware elements, increasing adaptability while managing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Adaptability or versatility

If fixed hardware control elements are used, then the device is reliable and easy to operate, but the user cannot customize or change the control functionalities

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol mode flexibilityVSAvoidoperation intuitiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The control system transitions from static, fixed hardware configurations to dynamic, programmable control modes. The touch-sensitive means can be reconfigured through software to provide different control behaviors and functionalities, allowing the system to adapt to different user needs and contexts while maintaining ease of operation through intuitive touch gestures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the operational parameters of the control interface by implementing multiple programmable modes that alter how the touch-sensitive means responds to user gestures. Different modes can map the same physical gesture to different control functions, providing flexibility and customization while maintaining consistent and intuitive operation across different contexts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Duration of action of stationary object

If physical control systems are used, then the device is durable, but the mechanical parts have limited lifespan and require maintenance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice lifespanVSAvoidmechanical component reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Duration of action of stationary objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent eliminates mechanical moving parts in the control interface by using a touch-sensitive means that detects user input through electromagnetic fields. This substitution removes wear and tear associated with mechanical components like buttons and knobs, significantly extending the device lifespan and improving reliability without requiring maintenance of mechanical parts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The touch-sensitive means creates a virtual copy of traditional mechanical control functionality through software simulation. Instead of physical buttons and knobs, the system uses touch gestures that are processed to produce equivalent control effects, eliminating the need for durable mechanical components while maintaining the essential control functions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentUS9336762B2Electronic music instrument with touch-sensitive means
Publication Date: 2016.05.10 NATIVE INSTRUMENTS
  • US9336762B2 patent drawing
  • US9336762B2 patent drawing
  • US9336762B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An electronic music instrument is provided comprising at least one input element configured to trigger an output sound signal when pressed. The electronic music instrument further comprises a controlling device adapted to alter at least one parameter of at least one output sound signal triggered with the at least one input element. Furthermore, the electronic music instrument comprises a housing adapted to house the at least one input element and the controlling device. The controlling device comprises at least one touch-sensitive means wherein the parameter of the at least one output sound signal is altered corresponding to the position of at least one marker. The controlling device is adapted to set the position of the at least one marker by a simulation of a physical system, and wherein the state of the simulated physical system is alterable by a touching gesture on the at least one touch-sensitive means.