Touchpad Grounding Self-Test for Ghost Input Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Touchpads in portable information handling systems experience difficulties in distinguishing between intended and incidental touches due to signal and ground continuity issues, leading to false touch detections known as ghost inputs, which disrupt user experience and can cause system failures.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of first and second ground devices, such as conical springs, extend from the touchpad circuit board to contact the system ground, and a low resistance ohmmeter measures resistance between these devices to adjust touch detection sensitivity, reducing ghost touch errors.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If the touchpad pivots to accept press button input, then the touchpad functionality is improved, but signal and ground continuity becomes difficult to maintain

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetouchpad functionalityVSAvoidground continuity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The ground connection transitions from a static rigid structure to a dynamic flexible structure that can accommodate the pivoting motion of the touchpad while maintaining continuous electrical contact throughout the range of motion

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

A flexible ground connection structure is used instead of rigid conductors, allowing the ground path to bend and flex with the touchpad movement while maintaining electrical continuity, thus resolving the conflict between mechanical adaptability and electrical reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

2Measurement precision

If the touch detection surface is made sensitive to detect touches, then touch detection capability is improved, but false touch detections known as ghost inputs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetouch detection sensitivityVSAvoidghost inputs
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously monitors ground resistance and uses this feedback to dynamically adjust touch detection sensitivity thresholds, allowing the system to maintain high sensitivity for valid touches while automatically raising thresholds to reject ghost inputs when ground connection degradation is detected

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The touch detection parameters are dynamically changed based on measured ground resistance conditions, adjusting the sensitivity threshold parameter to match the actual ground connection quality, thus maintaining accurate touch detection across varying operational conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If ground interface is not optimal, then ghost input detection becomes a greater problem, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetouch detection accuracyVSAvoidgrounding system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The grounding system performs self-diagnosis by automatically measuring its own ground resistance and self-adjusts by modifying touch detection parameters based on the measured conditions, eliminating the need for external calibration or complex manual intervention systems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Improved ground contact through conical springs enhances touch detection accuracy and reduces ghost touch inputs by adjusting sensitivity based on measured resistance, ensuring reliable touch input detection.

Implementation Method 1

first and second ground devices, such as conical springs, extend from a touchpad circuit board to contact the system ground

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

a low resistance ohmmeter measures resistance between these devices to adjust touch detection sensitivity

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrical Resistance: Electrical Resistance

Data Source

PatentUS12602122B2Information handling system touch detection device grounding and self-test
Publication Date: 2026.04.14 DELL PROD LP
  • US12602122B2 patent drawing
  • US12602122B2 patent drawing
  • US12602122B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An information handling system includes a touchpad that accepts touch inputs to move a cursor on a display and that deflects at a front side to accept button inputs. A bracket is disposed between a touch detection surface and circuit board of the touchpad to bias the touch detection surface up and deflect in response to a push down as a button input. Conical spring ground devices coupled to the circuit board on opposing sides of the bracket interface with an ohmmeter included on the circuit board that detects a resistance from a first ground device through the system ground to a second ground device. Resistance across ground is applied by the touchpad processor to adjust touch detection sensitivity and avoid ghost inputs.