Touchpad Reaction Force Design for Clear Touch and Push Input

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing touchpad input devices cannot distinguish between touch and push operations, leading to accidental push inputs during touch operations due to finger contact with the surface.

Innovation Solution

An input device with an electrostatic sensor, a push switch, a transmission member, and an actuator that generates vibration, providing distinct reaction forces in different stroke regions to differentiate between touch and push operations through tactile feedback.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a touchpad allows both touch operation and push operation with finger contact, then the input device supports multiple input methods, but the operator cannot recognize which operation they are performing leading to accidental push operations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinput methodsVSAvoidoperation accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The actuator generates vibration that is transmitted to the operation panel via the transmission member. When lateral movement of the finger is detected during a touch operation, the actuator vibrates, providing tactile feedback to distinguish touch operations from push operations and prevent accidental pushes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #18Mechanical vibration

Solution Approach 2:

The electrostatic sensor detects lateral movement of the finger during touch operations and triggers the actuator to generate vibration. This feedback mechanism provides tactile distinction between touch and push operations, allowing operators to recognize their actions accurately and prevent accidental push operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If the operation panel is pushed deeply to activate a push switch, then the push operation is reliably detected, but the reaction force changes abruptly making it difficult to distinguish from heavy touch operations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepush operation detectionVSAvoidoperation distinction
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The stroke region is divided into a first stroke region and a second stroke region. In the first stroke region, only the first elastic portion is engaged providing a first reaction force. In the second stroke region, both the first elastic portion and the push switch are engaged providing a second reaction force that is a resultant force of both components. This segmentation creates distinct reaction force characteristics for different operation depths.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The reaction force characteristics change based on the stroke region. In the vicinity of the boundary between the first stroke region and the second stroke region, the amount of change in the first reaction force with respect to stroke length is less than the amount of change in the second reaction force. This parameter change provides tactile feedback to distinguish push operations from touch operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Prevents accidental push operations during touch operations by providing clear tactile differentiation between touch and push strokes, allowing operators to recognize their actions accurately.

Implementation Method 1

an electrostatic sensor, where the operation panel allows a touch operation and a push operation to be performed thereon

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrostatic sensor detection: Electrostatics

Implementation Method 2

an actuator configured to generate vibration. The touch operation is an operation performed by the operator to touch a surface of the operation panel with the operator's finger and move the operator's finger. If lateral movement of the finger is detected by the electrostatic sensor in the touch operation, the actuator vibrates, and the vibration is transmitted to the operation panel via the transmission member.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVibration generation and transmission: Vibration

Implementation Method 3

In a first stroke region in which the operation panel is pushed in the touch operation, a first reaction force exerted by pushing the operation panel is generated by the first elastic portion.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElastic reaction force: Elasticity

Implementation Method 4

In a second stroke region subsequent to the first stroke region in the push operation, a second reaction force exerted by pushing the operation panel is a resultant force of the reaction force generated by the first elastic portion and the operation feeling generated by the push switch.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical force feedback: Mechanical Force

Data Source

PatentUS11928293B2Input device
Publication Date: 2024.03.12 ALPS ALPINE CO LTD
  • US11928293B2 patent drawing
  • US11928293B2 patent drawing
  • US11928293B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An input device is characterized in that in a first stroke region in which an operation panel is pushed during a touch operation, a first reaction force that occurs by pushing the operation panel is generated by the first elastic portion. In a second stroke region including a stroke longer than in the first stroke region and a stroke for performing a push operation, a second reaction force that occurs by pushing the operation panel is a resultant force generated by a first elastic portion and the push switch. In the vicinity of a boundary between the first stroke region and the second stroke region, the amount of change in the first reaction force with respect to a stroke length is less than the amount of change in the second reaction force with respect to a stroke length.