Touchscreen Underlining for Reading Fluency Assessment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for evaluating reading fluency are either unnatural, lack precision, or are not suitable for monitoring multiple readers over time, such as in a classroom setting, and require special equipment or calibration.

Innovation Solution

A system that uses a tablet with touchscreen technology to monitor underlining of text by readers, providing detailed information on reading rate, pauses, and regressions, allowing for natural and precise assessment of reading fluency without the need for individual monitors or special equipment.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If eye tracking is used to identify reading difficulties, then measurement precision is improved, but device complexity and calibration requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereading difficulty detectionVSAvoidcalibration requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses a simplified copy of eye tracking functionality through touchscreen underlining detection. Instead of using complex eye tracking hardware and calibration procedures, the system captures reading behavior through the simpler act of users underlining words on a touchscreen, which can be directly measured without specialized equipment or calibration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical/optical eye tracking system with a software-based detection system that monitors touchscreen interactions. The system substitutes physical eye movement tracking with digital signal processing of underlining actions, eliminating the need for cameras, sensors, and complex calibration routines.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Ease of operation

If moving windows paradigm is used to measure reading processes, then ease of operation is improved, but measurement precision and naturalness deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereading task simplicityVSAvoidreading difficulty identification
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a simplified copy of natural reading behavior by having users underline words as they read them naturally on a touchscreen. This preserves the naturalness of reading while capturing precise measurement data about reading rate, pauses, and regressions through the underlining actions themselves.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The touchscreen underlining system serves multiple functions simultaneously: it captures reading behavior data, identifies reading difficulties, and maintains natural reading conditions. The same simple underlining action provides both ease of operation and precise measurement capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Device complexity

If paper-and-pencil assessments are used, then device complexity is reduced, but measurement precision and information quality deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveequipment requirementsVSAvoidreading behavior data
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces paper-and-pencil assessments with a digital touchscreen system that automatically captures and records reading behavior. The system substitutes manual scoring with automated detection of underlining patterns, providing precise temporal and spatial data about reading processes that cannot be obtained from paper assessments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system provides immediate feedback by automatically analyzing underlining patterns and providing detailed information about reading rate, pauses, and regressions in real-time. This feedback mechanism enables precise measurement and immediate intervention, superior to the delayed feedback of paper-and-pencil assessments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Measurement precision

If individual monitors are used for each reader, then measurement precision is improved, but device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereading fluency assessmentVSAvoidmonitoring infrastructure
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a universal reading assessment platform that can serve multiple readers simultaneously through a single touchscreen system. The system is designed to accommodate multiple users without requiring individual monitors or specialized equipment for each reader, reducing overall system complexity while maintaining precise measurement capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates a simplified copy of individualized reading assessment through a shared touchscreen interface. Instead of requiring separate monitoring infrastructure for each reader, the system uses a universal touchscreen that can be used by multiple students, with the software distinguishing between different readers through their interaction patterns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentUS9786195B2System and method for evaluating reading fluency using underlining
Publication Date: 2017.10.10 UNIVERSITY OF MEMPHIS RESEARCH FOUNDATION
  • US9786195B2 patent drawing
  • US9786195B2 patent drawing
  • US9786195B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system of evaluating reading fluency by monitoring the underlining of text as it is being read on a tablet or other computing device. The text or passage is presented on the screen of the tablet computing device with a touchscreen, such as, but not limited to, an iPad. The reader uses a stylus, finger, or other device to underline each word as it is read, and may go back and re-underline any words to regress within the passage. Alternatively, a mouse can be used to indicate words as they are read. Computer software tracks the reader's underlining, providing detailed information about reading rate, pauses, regressions, and other word and word combination features.