Tower Crane Chord Cross-Section Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing crane designs face challenges in achieving optimal weight and strength due to constant cross-sectional profiles in longitudinal chords, leading to oversizing and increased weight, and the use of high-strength steel complicates manufacturing and increases costs, while fiber-reinforced materials lack impact resistance.

Innovation Solution

Adapting longitudinal chord cross-sections to varying force conditions within truss sections without welding, using a single-piece, homogeneous steel or steel profile with weld-free transitions and profile widenings at connection points for stress reduction, allowing for varying cross-sections and reduced material usage.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If longitudinal chords are designed with constant cross-section to simplify manufacturing, then ease of manufacture is improved, but weight increases due to oversizing in weaker sections

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing simplicityVSAvoidcrane structure weight
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The longitudinal chords are designed with varying cross-sections tailored to the specific force conditions in each truss field. Sections with higher tensile forces have larger cross-sections, while sections with lower forces have smaller cross-sections, optimizing material usage and reducing overall weight without compromising structural integrity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The longitudinal chords are divided into multiple sections with different cross-sections corresponding to different framework fields. Each section is optimized for its specific load conditions, allowing the structure to achieve weight optimization while maintaining manufacturing feasibility through modular assembly

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Weight of moving object

If different belt parts are assembled and welded to achieve varying cross-sections, then weight optimization is improved, but manufacturing complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecrane structure weightVSAvoidmanufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of moving objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The cross-sectional parameters of the longitudinal chords are varied continuously or stepwise along their length to match the varying force conditions in different truss fields. This allows weight optimization through localized parameter adaptation without requiring complex assembly of multiple different components

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The chord cross-sections are designed to dynamically adapt to the changing force conditions along the span, with each section optimized for its specific position in the framework, achieving weight reduction while maintaining manufacturing simplicity through standardized production methods

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Strength

If high-strength steel is used to achieve optimal strength-to-weight ratio, then strength is improved, but manufacturing difficulty and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural strengthVSAvoidmanufacturing ease
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

High-strength steel is selectively applied in sections where the forces are greatest, while lower-strength materials can be used in sections with lower load demands. This localized material optimization achieves the required overall strength while reducing manufacturing complexity and cost compared to using high-strength steel throughout the entire structure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Weight of moving object

If fiber-reinforced materials are used to reduce weight, then weight is improved, but impact and shock resistance deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecrane structure weightVSAvoidimpact resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of moving objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The structure utilizes composite material systems that combine the high strength-to-weight ratio of fiber-reinforced materials with the impact resistance of traditional steel components. This hybrid approach achieves weight reduction while maintaining the reliability and shock resistance required for crane operations in harsh conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Data Source

PatentEP3187453B1Crane
Publication Date: 2018.10.17 LIEBHERR WERK BIBERACH GMBH
  • EP3187453B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3187453B1 patent drawingFigure 2~3
  • EP3187453B1 patent drawingFigure 4~5

AI summary

The present invention relates to a crane, in particular a tower crane, with at least one truss girder (7) comprising several longitudinal chords (8, 9) connected to one another by transverse and/or diagonal members (10), wherein at least one of the longitudinal chords (8) has a chord cross-section that changes along its length and/or different chord cross-sections in different truss bays (11, 12, 13). According to the invention, the at least one longitudinal chord (8) having a chord cross-section that changes along its length or different chord cross-sections in different truss bays (11, 12, 13) has weld-free transitions between chord sections of different chord cross-sections, wherein the longitudinal chord (8) comprises a profile widening (18) at at least one connection point (14, 15, 16, 17) of a transverse and/or diagonal member (10), from which the chord cross-section decreases on both sides in the longitudinal direction of the chord.