Toxicity Evaluation Flow Display for Metabolic Reaction Prediction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing toxicity evaluation methods fail to provide clear display methods for metabolic reaction predictions and toxicity evaluations, making it difficult to understand the evaluation path followed.

Innovation Solution

An information processing apparatus and method that generates a display image showing metabolic reactions and toxicity evaluations, with a determination flow indicating the toxicity determination procedure, allowing paths to be distinguished and providing detailed explanations for each step.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a comprehensive toxicity evaluation system is implemented that includes metabolic reaction predictions and multiple determination steps, then the reliability of toxicity evaluation is improved, but the complexity of the evaluation process increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetoxicity evaluation reliabilityVSAvoidevaluation process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The toxicity evaluation process is divided into multiple determination steps (first determination step, second determination step, etc.), each focusing on specific aspects such as metabolic reactions, toxicity thresholds, and compound groups. This segmentation allows the complex evaluation to be managed through discrete, manageable stages while maintaining overall reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The evaluation system dynamically adapts its determination flow based on results from previous steps. If a compound meets certain criteria in an early determination step, the system can skip subsequent steps or modify the evaluation path, making the process flexible rather than rigidly sequential.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Loss of information

If detailed determination flows with multiple branching paths are displayed, then the completeness of toxicity evaluation information is improved, but the difficulty of understanding the evaluation path increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevaluation information completenessVSAvoidevaluation path understandability
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

Different portions of the determination flow are presented with different levels of detail and visual prominence based on their relevance to the current evaluation context. Critical paths and determination steps are highlighted or emphasized, while less relevant information is presented more subtly, allowing users to focus on important aspects without being overwhelmed by complete information.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system acts as an intermediary that processes and presents determination flow information in a simplified manner. It takes the complex multi-branch determination logic and translates it into an understandable display format, mediating between the complex evaluation algorithm and the user's comprehension needs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Measurement precision

If the evaluation system processes multiple compounds including metabolites through comprehensive metabolic reactions, then the accuracy of toxicity prediction is improved, but the processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetoxicity prediction accuracyVSAvoidevaluation processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary processing by pre-identifying metabolic reactions and potential metabolite structures before conducting full toxicity evaluations. By preparing metabolic transformation data in advance, the system reduces the time required for actual toxicity assessment while maintaining comprehensive coverage of metabolites and their toxicities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The determination flow allows the system to skip certain evaluation steps for compounds that clearly meet or fail specific criteria. For example, if a compound or metabolite exceeds a predetermined toxicity threshold in an early assessment, subsequent determination steps may be bypassed, reducing processing time while maintaining evaluation accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #21Skipping (Rushing through)

Data Source

PatentUS20260029395A1Information processing apparatus, information processing method, and program
Publication Date: 2026.01.29 FUJIFILM CORP
  • US20260029395A1 patent drawing
  • US20260029395A1 patent drawing
  • US20260029395A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An information processing apparatus includes a processor, in which the processor is configured to generate a display image that shows a prediction result of metabolic reactions occurring in vivo from a test substance and metabolites generated by the metabolic reactions and an evaluation result of toxicity of at least one compound in a compound group composed of the test substance and the metabolites, and that includes a determination flow indicating a toxicity determination procedure, which is used in an evaluation of the toxicity, has at least one determination step, and has a path that branches according to a determination result of the determination step, in which, in a case where the compound is selected in the display image, a path that leads to the evaluation result of the compound among a plurality of paths is shown in a distinguishable manner from the other paths, and execute control of outputting the generated display image.