T/R Module Performance Bounds Using Pareto Front Matching

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing transmit-receive (T/R) modules fail to simultaneously provide complete transmitter-receiver isolation and prevent signal power loss, requiring extensive trial-and-error efforts to design matching circuits that maximize isolation and minimize insertion loss across a narrow frequency band.

Innovation Solution

A method to identify performance bounds of T/R modules by measuring isolation and insertion loss, then using mathematical representations of multiport matching circuits with a fixed number of capacitors and inductors to approximate a Pareto front, visualizing possible tradeoffs for improving T/R module performance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If matching circuits are designed to maximize transmitter-receiver isolation, then isolation performance is improved, but insertion loss increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransmitter-receiver isolationVSAvoidinsertion loss
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial action by designing matching circuits that achieve sufficient but not excessive isolation levels. Instead of pursuing complete isolation which would cause excessive insertion loss, the method identifies optimal points on the Pareto front where isolation is improved to a practical degree while accepting minimal insertion loss penalty. This resolves the contradiction by finding the sweet spot where further isolation improvement would not provide practical benefit but would significantly increase loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent utilizes parameter changes by systematically varying matching circuit component values and configurations to map out the tradeoff surface between isolation and insertion loss. By changing circuit parameters and measuring performance across the Pareto front, the method identifies optimal operating points that balance both competing requirements, resolving the contradiction through quantitative parameter optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If extensive experiments and trial-and-error efforts are used to design matching circuits, then performance optimization is attempted, but design time and complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveperformance optimizationVSAvoiddesign time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-characterizing the T/R module and antenna system to establish the Pareto front before final matching circuit design. By performing initial measurements and calculations to map the tradeoff surface, the method eliminates the need for extensive trial-and-error experimentation later in the design process. This preliminary characterization resolves the contradiction by providing a roadmap for optimal design that avoids time-consuming iterative experiments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses copying by creating a mathematical model of the T/R module and antenna system that replicates their electromagnetic behavior. This model allows virtual experimentation and optimization without physical prototyping, significantly reducing design time while maintaining accuracy. The model copies the essential characteristics of the physical system, enabling rapid exploration of matching circuit options without repeated physical measurements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Reliability

If matching circuits are designed for narrow frequency bands, then isolation and insertion loss are optimized, but bandwidth coverage is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveisolation and insertion loss optimizationVSAvoidfrequency bandwidth
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies universality by developing a methodology that can evaluate and optimize matching circuits across multiple frequency bands simultaneously. The Pareto front analysis framework is designed to handle broadband applications by considering performance across the entire frequency range of interest, not just narrow bands. This allows a single matching circuit design to be evaluated for its broadband performance characteristics, resolving the contradiction by enabling multi-frequency optimization within a unified framework.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS9971668B1Method for identifying the performance bounds of a transmit-receive module
Publication Date: 2018.05.15 THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AS REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY OF THE NAVY
  • US9971668B1 patent drawing
  • US9971668B1 patent drawing
  • US9971668B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for identifying performance bounds of a transmit-receive (T/R) module over a bandwidth ƒb when connected to an antenna, a transmitter, and a receiver all with known reflectance within the bandwidth ƒb; measuring a raw T/R module point representing isolation and insertion loss of the T/R module when connected to the antenna, the transmitter, and the receiver without a matching circuit; plotting the raw T/R module point on a performance image graph; using a mathematical representation of a multiport matching circuit that contains no gyrators and comprises a fixed number of capacitors and inductors to approximate a Pareto front comprised of a plurality of Pareto points; and connecting each Pareto point to the raw T/R module point on the performance image graph such that the performance image becomes a visual representation of the performance bounds of a class of multiport matching circuits having capacitors and inductors.