Trace-Level Microservice Autoscaling for Coordinated SLO Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current autoscaling methods in microservices-based applications set service level objectives (SLOs) at the microservice level, leading to inefficient resource allocation and potential violations, as users experience performance at the aggregated trace level for end-to-end user transactions.

Innovation Solution

A trace-driven, dependency-set-aware proactive coordinated autoscaling system that generates performance-resource elasticity models at the trace level, using machine learning to predict workload levels and recommend microservice replica scaling to meet predefined trace-level SLOs, leveraging column-generation based optimization for resource allocation across microservices.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If autoscaling is performed at the microservice level with individual SLOs, then resource scaling can be controlled per service, but resource allocation becomes inefficient and SLO violations occur due to lack of coordination

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource allocation efficiencyVSAvoidSLO violation rate
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges individual microservice SLOs into a unified trace-level SLO framework. By combining the scaling decisions of multiple microservices into a coordinated trace-level optimization problem, the system achieves efficient resource allocation while maintaining SLO compliance across the entire distributed transaction flow.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a universal trace-level autoscaling mechanism that simultaneously manages multiple microservices. The trace-level SLO framework serves multiple functions: it coordinates scaling across services, optimizes resource allocation holistically, and ensures SLO compliance for the entire distributed transaction, rather than handling each service independently.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Productivity

If trace-level SLOs are implemented with coordinated autoscaling, then resource allocation efficiency improves, but system complexity increases due to multi-service coordination

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource allocation efficiencyVSAvoidsystem coordination complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the complex trace-level autoscaling problem into manageable components: trace identification, dependency graph construction, elasticity model generation, and coordinated optimization. This segmentation allows the system to handle complexity through structured decomposition while maintaining trace-level coordination.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary trace-level coordination layer that mediates between individual microservices and the autoscaling decision-making process. This intermediary framework translates complex multi-service coordination requirements into coordinated scaling actions, reducing the perceived complexity while maintaining efficient resource allocation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If proactive coordinated autoscaling is implemented, then performance violations are minimized, but computational overhead increases due to elasticity modeling and optimization

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveperformance violation rateVSAvoidcomputational overhead
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary actions by generating elasticity models in advance and using them for proactive scaling decisions. The system pre-computes the relationship between resource allocation and performance metrics, allowing it to make informed scaling decisions before performance violations occur, thereby reducing reactive computational overhead.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms where actual performance metrics are continuously monitored and fed back into the elasticity models. This feedback loop allows the system to refine its predictions and optimize scaling decisions over time, improving reliability while managing computational overhead through learned patterns rather than exhaustive recalculation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20250355719A1Trace-driven call dependency-set aware proactive coordinated distributed auto-scaling for resource management
Publication Date: 2025.11.20 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US20250355719A1 patent drawing
  • US20250355719A1 patent drawing
  • US20250355719A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A computer-implemented method for trace-driven dependency-set-aware proactive coordinated autoscaling of component microservices in an application includes generating performance-resource elasticity models at a trace-level for traces of the application using dependency set of microservices for each trace. The method predicts workload levels of each of the traces, and also predicts a trace-level performance of the application for different microservice replica scaling based on the dependency set of microservices for each trace, performance-resource elasticity models and the predicted workload levels. The method uses distributed computing to recommend a microservice replica scaling for each of the component microservices to meet one or more predefined trace-level user service level objectives.