TRACE Platform Dynamic Structured Analytic Techniques

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current decision support systems and crowdsourcing platforms face challenges in providing effective reasoning and decision-making support for intelligence analysts, particularly due to cognitive biases and the lack of context-sensitive structured analytic techniques, which can lead to inaccurate and inefficient decision-making processes.

Innovation Solution

The TRACE system integrates stigmergic coordination and crowdsourcing with structured analytic techniques to facilitate improved reasoning and decision-making by allowing analysts to build on each other's contributions without explicit coordination, using a web-based platform that provides analytic techniques and information to support quality reasoning and communication.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional decision support systems are used, then cognitive biases can be addressed through structured techniques, but the systems lack context-sensitivity and place large cognitive burden on analysts

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereasoning qualityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adapts structured analytic techniques to match the specific problem context and individual analyst characteristics. The platform automatically adjusts the complexity and type of STs presented based on real-time analysis of the reasoning problem being addressed and the analyst's demonstrated abilities, rather than applying fixed rigid structures to all users.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system provides customized structured analytic techniques tailored to each specific problem context and analyst profile. Different analysts receive different STs and levels of guidance based on their individual demonstrated abilities and the specific characteristics of the reasoning problem they are working on, rather than a one-size-fits-all approach.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Reliability

If structured analytic techniques are applied to all analysts, then reasoning quality improves, but cognitive load increases and time to complete analysis increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereasoning qualityVSAvoidanalysis time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies structured analytic techniques selectively rather than universally. It provides STs and guidance only when and where they are most beneficial based on the specific problem context and analyst's demonstrated abilities, avoiding unnecessary application of structures to simple problems or highly skilled analysts who don't need them.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The level and type of structured technique application dynamically adjusts based on real-time assessment of the analyst's needs and the problem's complexity. The system monitors analyst performance and adapts the amount of structured guidance provided, reducing cognitive load when less support is needed while maintaining reasoning quality when more support is beneficial.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Measurement precision

If context-sensitive structured techniques are implemented, then reasoning accuracy improves, but the system requires complex adaptation to individual problem contexts and analyst abilities

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereasoning accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically assesses each analyst's demonstrated abilities and each problem's context characteristics, then self-configures the appropriate structured analytic techniques without requiring manual setup or complex external configuration. The platform autonomously adapts to individual users and problems through built-in assessment and adaptation mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically constructs customized workflows by automatically matching structured analytic techniques to the specific problem context and analyst profile. This dynamic adaptation occurs in real-time based on assessed characteristics rather than requiring pre-configured complex rules for every possible scenario.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Productivity

If crowdsourcing is used to generate ideas and solutions, then productivity increases, but cognitive biases can still influence crowd reasoning and decision-making

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveidea generation rateVSAvoidreasoning quality
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system provides structured analytic techniques and guidance to crowd workers during the idea generation and evaluation process. By embedding STs in the crowdsourcing workflow, the system gives real-time feedback and guidance that helps crowd workers recognize and correct cognitive biases while maintaining high productivity through parallel processing of multiple problems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS11507859B2Trackable reasoning and analysis for crowdsourcing and evaluation
Publication Date: 2022.11.22 SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY
  • US11507859B2 patent drawing
  • US11507859B2 patent drawing
  • US11507859B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In an example, a computer-implemented method to structure an analytical workflow that improves reasoning based on a problem context and demonstrated abilities of each individual user may include displaying a reasoning problem to an analyst. The method may include receiving input from the analyst to identify a reasoning problem type of the reasoning problem. providing a recommended analytic approach for the reasoning problem type to the analyst. The method may include assisting the analyst in analyzing and evaluating one or more information sources relevant to the reasoning problem. The method may include guiding the analyst through a structured technique (ST) to support reasoning of the analyst in formulation of a solution to the reasoning problem. The method may include generating a report that includes the analyst's solution to the reasoning problem based on input from the analyst.