Track Boundary Approximation Using Segmented Image Curve Fitting

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional methods for estimating road markings for vehicle travel control are prone to errors and blurring due to restrictions in curve fitting and variations in image extraction, leading to unstable road marking estimation for vehicle control.

Innovation Solution

An image processing device and method that divides an image into areas to generate element functions approximating track boundaries based on probability values, combining these functions with a weighting system to create a composite function for accurate road marking estimation and driving control.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If a curved line is fitted to a plurality of positions extracted from an image to estimate road markings, then the estimation process is simple, but the error in the estimated road markings is large and blurring occurs due to variations in extracted positions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesimplicity of estimation processVSAvoidaccuracy of road marking estimation
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The image is divided into multiple divided areas, and road marking estimation is performed separately for each area using element functions. This segmentation allows localized accurate fitting while maintaining overall simplicity, resolving the contradiction between simple processing and high accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different element functions are used for different divided areas based on local characteristics. Each area's road marking is estimated with a function tailored to its specific properties, improving local accuracy while keeping the overall system simple through modular processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Device complexity

If a single composite function is used to approximate the entire track boundary, then the model is simple, but it cannot capture local variations and produces blurring

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomplexity of approximation modelVSAvoidstability of road marking estimation
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The track boundary approximation is segmented into multiple element functions, each handling a specific divided area. This creates a composite model that is more complex than a single function but remains manageable through modular structure, while significantly improving reliability by capturing local variations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The approximation model uses a composite structure combining multiple element functions (analogous to composite materials). Each element function contributes to the overall approximation, creating a robust model that maintains stability while adapting to local characteristics of different road marking sections.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Productivity

If curve fitting is performed with restricted degrees of freedom to maintain simplicity, then the model is easy to compute, but the estimation error increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomputational efficiencyVSAvoidaccuracy of track boundary approximation
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The computational task is segmented into multiple element function fittings, each with restricted degrees of freedom for efficiency. The overall accuracy is maintained by combining these simple local fittings into a composite model, achieving both computational efficiency and high precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of performing a single complex curve fitting with high degrees of freedom, the system performs multiple simpler partial fittings (element functions) across divided areas. This partial action approach maintains computational efficiency while achieving superior overall accuracy through the composite model.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS20230316780A1Image processing device, image processing method, and storage medium
Publication Date: 2023.10.05 HONDA MOTOR CO LTD
  • US20230316780A1 patent drawing
  • US20230316780A1 patent drawing
  • US20230316780A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An image processing device divides an image representing an area in front of a mobile object, which is captured by a camera mounted on the mobile object, at predetermined intervals to generate an element function that approximates a track boundary in each of divided areas on the basis of: a probability value indicating an existence probability of the track boundary for each of coordinates in each of the areas; and the coordinates corresponding to the probability value, generates a composite function that approximates a track boundary in the front area by combining the element functions generated for each of the areas, and executes driving control or driving assistance of the mobile object on the basis of the track boundary approximated by the generated composite function.