Track-Guided Passenger Vehicle Front Curvature for Bidirectional Aerodynamics

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Aerodynamic optimization for track-guided vehicles in the commuter sector has been overlooked, leading to higher driving resistance and susceptibility to crosswinds, while existing solutions focus on high-speed trains and prioritize forward travel over bidirectional efficiency.

Innovation Solution

Designing the vehicle head with a front curvature and flow separation edges, including a cylindrical front surface with a consistent curvature, inclined angle, and edge radii to ensure clean air separation, reducing air resistance and improving crosswind stability for both forward and reverse travel.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Use of energy by moving object

If the vehicle head is optimized for forward travel only, then forward aerodynamics are improved, but reverse travel aerodynamics deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaerodynamic efficiencyVSAvoidbidirectional operation capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The front surface is designed with asymmetric curvature characteristics - a first region with a first radius of curvature and a second region with a second radius of curvature. This asymmetric design allows the surface to interact with airflow differently depending on the direction of travel, optimizing aerodynamic performance for both forward and reverse operation while maintaining distinct flow patterns for each direction

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies flow separation edges at specific locations on the front surface that create controlled stagnation points. When the vehicle travels in reverse, the airflow pattern inverts and creates stagnation points at different locations on the same front surface, effectively making the surface adapt to bidirectional flow conditions through strategic edge placement rather than requiring symmetric design

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

2Stability of the object's composition

If the front surface has a large radius of curvature, then crosswind stability is improved, but driving resistance increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecrosswind stabilityVSAvoiddriving resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The front surface is divided into different regions with different radius of curvature values - a first region with a first radius and a second region with a second radius. This local differentiation allows specific areas to optimize for crosswind stability while other areas minimize drag, rather than applying a uniform large radius across the entire surface

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Ease of manufacture

If the front surface is flat, then manufacturing is simplified, but aerodynamic performance deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing simplicityVSAvoidaerodynamic drag
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The front surface incorporates controlled curvatures with specific radii in different regions, creating a streamlined shape that reduces aerodynamic drag. The curvature is applied selectively rather than uniformly, maintaining manufacturability while achieving the aerodynamic benefits of curved surfaces

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The design achieves reduced driving resistance and improved crosswind stability, enabling high-speed operation without compromising interior capacity, while maintaining attractive aesthetics and ease of cleaning.

Implementation Method 1

The inventive front curvature of the front surface reduces the air resistance at the front of the vehicle

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAerodynamic flow: Drag

Implementation Method 2

the flow separation edge is designed in such a way that a clean separation of the surrounding air is ensured in the trailing vehicle head, thereby achieving lower air resistance at the trailing vehicle head

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFlow separation: Flow Separation

Implementation Method 3

Furthermore, the susceptibility to crosswinds is reduced due to the frontal curvature of the front surface

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAerodynamic stability: Drag

Data Source

PatentEP4600108A1Track-guided passenger transport vehicle
Publication Date: 2025.08.13 SIEMENS MOBILITY GMBH
  • EP4600108A1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP4600108A1 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP4600108A1 patent drawingFigure 5

AI summary

The invention relates to a track-guided vehicle 1 for passenger transport, comprising at least one vehicle head 10, preferably two vehicle heads 10, wherein the at least one vehicle head 10 has a front surface 100 with a front curvature FW and at least one, preferably circumferential, flow separation edge SK, DK, UK.