High Carbon Steel Track Shoe with Reliefs for Wear Resistance
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Existing track shoes for mobile machines are prone to wear, heavy, and costly due to their low carbon content, leading to increased maintenance and fuel consumption, and are cumbersome to replace or repair.
Innovation Solution
The track shoe design incorporates high carbon content steel with reduced grouser bar dimensions and strategically placed reliefs to maintain yield strength while minimizing mass, using a combination of high carbon content steels like SAE 15B34, SAE 40BV40, and SAE 15B27 steel, and optimized geometry to reduce overall mass and manufacturing costs.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Stability of the object's composition
If low carbon content steel is used for track shoes, then ductility is improved, but wear resistance deteriorates
Solution Approach 1:
The patent applies parameter changes by increasing the carbon content of the steel from typical low carbon levels (0.05-0.25% C) to high carbon content (0.3-0.6% C), fundamentally changing the material properties to achieve superior wear resistance while maintaining adequate ductility through controlled composition ranges
2Reliability
If high carbon content steel is used for track shoes, then wear resistance is improved, but mass increases
Solution Approach 1:
The patent resolves this contradiction by changing the material parameter (carbon content) to achieve wear resistance, but then compensates for the mass increase through geometric optimization - reducing grouser bar dimensions and adding reliefs to the base, thereby achieving the desired wear resistance with minimized mass
3Reliability
If high carbon content steel is used for track shoes, then durability is improved, but manufacturing cost increases
Solution Approach 1:
The patent addresses the cost issue by optimizing the carbon content to a specific range (0.3-0.6% C) rather than using extremely high carbon content, balancing durability requirements with material cost. The geometric optimizations also reduce material consumption, further mitigating manufacturing costs
4Ease of manufacture
If standard track shoe geometry is used, then manufacturing simplicity is maintained, but wear performance deteriorates
Solution Approach 1:
The patent applies local quality by modifying specific geometric features (grouser bar dimensions, relief locations and sizes) rather than completely redesigning the track shoe. This targeted approach optimizes wear performance in critical areas while maintaining overall manufacturing simplicity and compatibility with existing manufacturing processes
Data Source
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
AI summary
A mobile machine track shoe (24) includes a ground engaging surface (26) including a first grouser bar (32) and a second grouser bar (33) substantially parallel to the first grouser bar (32). The track shoe (24) further includes a base (28) opposite the ground engaging surface (26). The base (28) includes a first relief (40) disposed opposite the first grouser bar (32), and a second relief (42) disposed opposite the second grouser bar (33).