Tracked Straddle Fork Layout for Low-Compaction Bin Handling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional straddle fork vehicles are inefficient in carrying multiple pallet bins, cause ground compaction, have large turning radii, unreliable brakes, and produce excessive pollution, limiting their effectiveness in agricultural settings.

Innovation Solution

A straddle fork vehicle with a track drive system, eco-engine, hydraulic brake system, and adjustable fork assemblies, allowing for improved stability, reduced ground pressure, and increased bin capacity, along with a soil ripper for soil disturbance, enhancing maneuverability and environmental friendliness.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If conventional straddle fork vehicles are used to carry pallet bins, then the vehicle can transport bins from rows, but the vehicle can only carry a limited number of bins requiring multiple trips

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of pallet bins carriedVSAvoidefficiency of bin collection
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The vehicle is divided into multiple independent fork assemblies (front fork assembly and rear fork assembly) that can operate independently or simultaneously. Each fork assembly can carry multiple pallet bins, allowing the vehicle to collect bins from different locations in a single trip rather than making multiple sequential trips.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention transitions from a single-point collection approach to a multi-point collection approach by adding fork assemblies at both the front and rear of the vehicle. This dimensional expansion allows simultaneous collection from multiple bins along the row, dramatically increasing the quantity of bins transported per trip.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Speed

If wheels are configured on the vehicle frame, then the vehicle can move through the field, but the wheels create pressure points that compact the ground

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevehicle mobilityVSAvoidground compaction
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The invention replaces rigid wheels with flexible track belts that distribute the vehicle's weight over a larger surface area. These track belts conform to the ground surface while providing traction, eliminating the concentrated pressure points created by wheels and reducing soil compaction and rut formation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

3Device complexity

If the vehicle has a standard drive train configuration, then the vehicle can be constructed simply, but the vehicle requires a large turning radius

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesimplicity of vehicle constructionVSAvoidturning radius
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The invention employs independently controllable track belts at the front and rear of the vehicle, allowing differential speed control between the two tracks. This dynamic control enables the vehicle to pivot in place or execute tight turns by varying the speed and direction of each track belt, dramatically reducing the turning radius compared to conventional rigid drive train configurations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Reliability

If conventional brake systems are used in the vehicle, then the braking mechanism can be implemented, but the brakes are unreliable and may fail

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebrake system reliabilityVSAvoidbrake fluid release to environment
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The invention replaces conventional mechanical or hydraulic brake systems with an electric braking system that uses electric motors to provide regenerative or dynamic braking. This eliminates the need for brake fluid entirely, preventing environmental contamination from fluid leaks while providing more reliable and controllable braking through electronic control systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #29Pneumatics and hydraulics

5Power

If conventional engines are used in the vehicle, then the vehicle can be powered, but the engines produce copious amounts of pollution and greenhouse gases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevehicle powerVSAvoidpollution and greenhouse gas emissions
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The invention replaces conventional internal combustion engines with electric motors powered by electric batteries. This substitution eliminates tailpipe emissions of pollutants and greenhouse gases entirely, while the electric motors provide sufficient power for field operations. The hydraulic cooling fan assembly continues to provide necessary cooling functionality without combustion-based heat generation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The vehicle efficiently carries more pallet bins with reduced ground compaction, improved turning radius, and lower emissions, while maintaining stability and environmental sustainability.

Implementation Method 1

The pair of tread belts may comprise a plurality of steel treads or a plurality of rubber treads... reduced ground pressure

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure distribution: Pressure Gradient

Implementation Method 2

The hydraulic brake system is functionally coupled to the pair of tread belts

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydraulic pressure: Hydraulic Press

Implementation Method 3

The track drive system is operationally connected to the engine by a hydrostatic transmission

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydrostatic transmission: Hydraulic Press

Implementation Method 4

the eco-engine is functionally coupled to a nearby hydraulic cooling fan assembly

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydraulic power transmission: Hydraulic Press

Data Source

PatentUS11772945B1Straddle fork vehicle
Publication Date: 2023.10.03 BERRY JOHN G
  • US11772945B1 patent drawing
  • US11772945B1 patent drawing
  • US11772945B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A straddle fork vehicle includes a generally rectangular frame structure with front and rear forklift assemblies positioned between a set of tread belts. The straddle fork vehicle is designed such that the frame may accommodate, or straddle, agricultural harvesting pallets between the set of treads in a passthrough through area beneath the frame as the vehicle progresses down a field row. Engine configuration and improved braking systems facilitate a safer construction and tighter turning radius.