Tracker Trajectory Validation for Autonomous Vehicle Collision Checking

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Autonomous vehicles face inaccuracies in collision checking due to discrepancies between generated and actual vehicle locations, leading to potential unsafe operations.

Innovation Solution

Implement a secondary computing device to generate a tracker trajectory based on an offset from a reference trajectory, verifying its accuracy by comparing predicted and actual vehicle positions, and issuing alerts for model updates to improve collision checking reliability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a vehicle computing system generates trajectories based on vehicle locations, then the vehicle can be controlled to follow desired paths, but differences between generated and actual vehicle locations result in inaccuracies in collision checking

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecollision checking accuracyVSAvoidvehicle location accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously monitors the difference between generated vehicle locations and actual vehicle locations, using this feedback to validate collision checking accuracy. When discrepancies are detected, the system can trigger alerts and initiate model updates to improve the accuracy of location tracking and collision detection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs validation of the tracker trajectory model before full deployment by comparing predicted positions with actual positions. This preliminary validation identifies potential inaccuracies in collision checking, allowing the system to update models proactively before unsafe conditions arise.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If a secondary computing device generates tracker trajectories to validate reference trajectories, then collision checking reliability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecollision checking reliabilityVSAvoidcomputing system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

A secondary computing device acts as an intermediary between the primary trajectory generation system and the validation process. This intermediary generates tracker trajectories based on offset relationships, enabling independent validation of collision checking without requiring complete system redesign.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates a copy of the trajectory generation process through the secondary computing device, which generates tracker trajectories that mirror the reference trajectory generation. This copying approach allows validation without adding significant complexity, as the secondary device uses the same algorithms and data structures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Reliability

If the system continuously validates tracker trajectory accuracy by comparing predicted and actual positions, then model performance decreases are identified, but loss of time occurs in processing

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel performance monitoringVSAvoidvalidation processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs partial validation by checking key position points along the trajectory rather than continuously validating every position. This approach identifies model performance decreases while minimizing processing time, focusing computational resources on critical validation points.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The validation process skips detailed analysis when the tracker trajectory closely matches the reference trajectory, only performing thorough checks when discrepancies exceed thresholds. This allows the system to quickly process valid trajectories while dedicating more time to investigating potential issues.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #21Skipping (Rushing through)

Data Source

PatentUS20260084695A1Tracker trajectory validation
Publication Date: 2026.03.26 ZOOX INC
  • US20260084695A1 patent drawing
  • US20260084695A1 patent drawing
  • US20260084695A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Collision avoidance and error determination for a component of an autonomous vehicle comprising receiving a first trajectory, such as to return a vehicle to an intended trajectory, that a vehicle is predicted to follow, based on an offset between the vehicle and a second trajectory associated with the vehicle, such as a reference trajectory. The first trajectory predicts a first movement characteristic (e.g., a position) of the vehicle at a point in time. A second movement characteristic is received, representing an actual movement characteristic of the vehicle at that point in time. A first error between the first and second movement characteristics is determined. Based at least in part on the first error, performance of a model for generating trajectories that a vehicle is predicted to follow is validated.