Traction Apparatus Control Method for Over-traction Prevention

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional traction apparatuses experience over-traction due to time lag in feedback control, leading to uncomfortable and delayed application of target traction force, especially when dealing with human subjects.

Innovation Solution

A traction force control method involving three steps: eliminating wire slack, continuously winding the wire to a predetermined initial target value, and stopping the drive mechanism when the target traction force is reached based on detected output from a traction force sensor, preventing over-traction and ensuring smooth application of the set traction force.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If feedback control is used to detect and control traction force, then the traction force can be controlled to reach the target value, but time lag occurs due to sensor response and feedback circuit delay causing over-traction

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetraction force detection accuracyVSAvoidtime lag in feedback control
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The control system performs preliminary action by predicting the optimal drive stop time in advance based on the relationship between drive amount and traction force. Instead of waiting for feedback after force application, the system calculates beforehand when to stop driving the wire based on expected traction force development, thereby compensating for the inherent time lag in force detection and feedback processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The invention inverts the conventional feedback control approach by determining the drive stop time from the drive amount rather than from the detected traction force. Instead of monitoring force and stopping when target is reached (which causes overshoot due to delay), the system stops the drive mechanism based on pre-calculated drive amount that corresponds to the target traction force, effectively reversing the control logic to eliminate time lag effects.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

2Object-affected harmful factors

If traction force is increased gradually in small increments to prevent over-traction, then over-traction is reduced, but it takes longer time to reach the target traction force and the sense of use is uncomfortable

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveover-traction forceVSAvoidtime to reach target traction force
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system performs preliminary calculation of the optimal drive stop time based on the target traction force and the relationship between drive amount and traction force. This allows the system to apply traction force continuously and rapidly without incremental increases, while still preventing over-traction by stopping the drive mechanism at the precisely calculated moment before the target force is exceeded.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Ease of operation

If wire slack is not eliminated before applying traction force, then the wire can be applied directly to the body, but the conversion between traction amount and traction force becomes inaccurate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedirect wire application to bodyVSAvoidtraction amount to force conversion accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The control system performs preliminary action by detecting and eliminating wire slack before the main traction force is applied. The drive mechanism is activated first to take up any slack in the wire, and only after the slack is eliminated does the system proceed to apply the calculated traction force. This preliminary slack elimination ensures accurate conversion between drive amount and traction force while maintaining ease of operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS8028590B2Traction apparatus and traction force control method of traction apparatus
Publication Date: 2011.10.04 ITO CO LTD
  • US8028590B2 patent drawing
  • US8028590B2 patent drawing
  • US8028590B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In the traction apparatus, a control circuit has the following traction control process portions. First, a first traction control process portion winds up the slack portion of a wire by a motor to eliminate the slack of the wire connected to a body to be pulled. Next, a second traction control process portion converts a set traction force that is set by an operation portion to a traction amount to calculate a converted value and, by defining a predetermined amount of a traction amount set based on the converted value as an initial target value, continuously winds up the wire by the motor to that target value. Next, a third traction control process portion detects the traction force that is being applied to the body to be pulled by a load cell, calculates a drive stop time of the motor by defining the set traction force as a final target value on the basis of a detected output of the load cell and drives the drive mechanism, and stops the driving of the motor at a point of reaching the drive stop time.