Traction Control Phasing by Vehicle Speed and Road Slope

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Modern automotive vehicles with dual drivelines face challenges in efficiently managing torque distribution between primary and secondary drivelines, particularly in varying terrain and vehicle dynamics, leading to issues with slippage and energy consumption.

Innovation Solution

A traction control system that dynamically adjusts maximum drive torque and regenerative braking torque based on vehicle speed and road slope using a controller-driven electric propulsion motor, ensuring that rotary power transmitted to vehicle wheels does not exceed predetermined limits, thereby optimizing traction and energy use.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If maximum torque is transmitted to secondary driveline wheels to prevent slippage, then traction control is improved, but energy consumption increases and wheel slippage may still occur under varying terrain conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetraction controlVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts the maximum torque transmitted to the secondary driveline based on real-time vehicle speed and road slope conditions. The controller phases in torque at low speeds on steep slopes and phases out torque at higher speeds or on level terrain, optimizing the balance between preventing wheel slippage and minimizing energy consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the torque parameter based on varying operating conditions. By monitoring vehicle speed and road slope, the controller adjusts the maximum torque limit transmitted through the secondary driveline, ensuring optimal traction control while reducing unnecessary energy expenditure when full torque is not required.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If secondary driveline applies pre-emptive drive torque, then wheel slippage is prevented, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewheel slippage preventionVSAvoiddual driveline control
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The secondary driveline applies pre-emptive drive torque before wheel slippage occurs, based on predicted terrain conditions. The controller anticipates slip conditions by monitoring vehicle speed and road slope, applying torque proactively to maintain traction and prevent slippage rather than reacting after slip occurs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Use of energy by moving object

If torque is adjusted based on vehicle speed and road slope, then energy consumption is optimized, but control system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy consumptionVSAvoidcontrol system
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system continuously monitors vehicle speed and road slope conditions, using this feedback to dynamically adjust the maximum torque transmitted to the secondary driveline. This closed-loop control optimizes energy consumption by matching torque output to actual terrain and speed conditions, preventing both wheel slippage and unnecessary energy expenditure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS8554441B1Phasing of traction control based on vehicle speed and road slope
Publication Date: 2013.10.08 E AAM DRIVELINE SYST
  • US8554441B1 patent drawing
  • US8554441B1 patent drawing
  • US8554441B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A traction control system and methodology that utilize a phase-out and phase-in of maximum drive torque and/or a regenerative brake torque based on vehicle speed and road slope.