Agricultural Traction Control for Safe Tire Spinning

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Agricultural machines with traction control systems face risks of damage when allowing wheels to spin freely, particularly in hydrostatic drive systems, due to excessive rotation speeds and temperatures, as existing systems lack an alternative control mechanism to manage these conditions effectively.

Innovation Solution

A traction control system with a user-selectable input allows wheels to spin freely until a predetermined deactivate condition is met, such as maximum rotation speed or temperature threshold, then switches back to primary traction control to prevent damage, using a controller and sensors to manage power distribution.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If the traction control system is suspended or disabled to allow wheels to spin freely for debris clearance, then the ease of operation is improved, but the reliability deteriorates due to increased risk of damage to propulsion components

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of operationVSAvoidreliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically switches between primary traction control mode and alternative free-spin mode based on operator input and monitored conditions. The controller enables real-time transition between constrained and unconstrained wheel operation, allowing the system to adapt its control characteristics according to operational needs while maintaining protective capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors wheel rotation speed and temperature conditions, and uses this feedback to automatically transition from alternative traction control back to primary traction control when predetermined thresholds are exceeded. This feedback mechanism ensures that even during free-spin operation, the system remains protected from damage by automatically re-engaging control when unsafe conditions arise.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Productivity

If the primary traction control is suspended to allow free wheel spinning, then the productivity is improved for debris clearance operations, but the object-affected harmful factors worsen due to excessive rotation speeds and temperatures

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveproductivityVSAvoidobject-affected harmful factors
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system establishes predetermined deactivate conditions (maximum rotation speed and temperature thresholds) before alternative traction control is engaged. These pre-set limits serve as preventive measures to stop harmful effects before they can cause damage to propulsion components, allowing productive free-spin operation within safe boundaries.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Solution Approach 2:

The system monitors wheel rotation speed and temperature in real-time during alternative traction control operation, and automatically transitions back to primary traction control when predetermined thresholds are exceeded. This continuous feedback ensures that harmful factors are controlled even during high-productivity free-spin operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Adaptability or versatility

If an alternative traction control system is implemented to allow selective wheel spinning, then the adaptability is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveadaptabilityVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The alternative traction control system serves multiple functions: it enables debris clearance operations, maintains protective control capabilities through predetermined thresholds, and provides operator-selectable control modes. By integrating these multiple functions into a unified system that shares hardware and control logic, the patent achieves versatility without proportionally increasing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system automatically monitors its own operational conditions (wheel speed, temperature) and self-regulates by transitioning between control modes based on predetermined criteria. This self-service capability reduces the need for complex external monitoring and control systems, as the alternative traction control system manages its own safety and operational state.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS10933742B2Operator input for alternative traction control
Publication Date: 2021.03.02 BLUE LEAF I P INC
  • US10933742B2 patent drawing
  • US10933742B2 patent drawing
  • US10933742B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An alternative traction control system, in addition to a primary traction control system, is associated with an agricultural machine in which a user selectable input can allow wheels of an the agricultural machine to spin freely, such as for clearing debris from tires, until a predetermined deactivate condition occurs. Such a deactivate condition could comprise, for example, reaching a maximum rotation speed and/or temperature threshold with respect to a wheel. To minimize the risk of damage to propulsion components which may be caused by excessive rotation speeds and/or temperatures, upon reaching such a threshold, operation can return from the alternative traction control system to the primary traction control system. Such a system can therefore allow an “on the fly” change that would permit an operator to selectively spin the tires without damaging mechanical aspects of the agricultural machine.