Vehicle with an improved suspension system

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing suspension systems for heavy or commercial vehicles equipped with electric traction modules are inadequate due to increased volume and oscillating mass, which compromises their mechanical performance.

Innovation Solution

A compact and optimized suspension system design featuring an independent arrangement between wheel hubs, utilizing a metal elastic cross member with damping elements and connecting structures to maintain mechanical properties, allowing for efficient energy exchange and damping of road forces.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Use of energy by moving object

If electric traction modules are added to heavy vehicles, then energy efficiency and emissions are improved, but the volume around the frame and oscillating mass increase, degrading suspension performance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy efficiencyVSAvoidsuspension system performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The suspension system is divided into independent suspension units for each wheel hub, with each unit containing its own damping elements and elastic cross member. This segmentation allows the suspension to be optimized for each wheel independently, accommodating the increased mass from electric traction modules while maintaining overall system performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The suspension system employs elastic cross members with controlled elasticity and damping elements that can dynamically adjust to varying loads and road conditions. The elastic cross member (7) in each suspension unit provides dynamic response to oscillations, adapting to the increased oscillating mass from electric motors and batteries.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Use of energy by moving object

If electric batteries are placed near electric machines, then energy exchange efficiency is improved, but the volume around the frame increases, compromising suspension design

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy exchange efficiencyVSAvoidframe volume
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSVolume of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The suspension system utilizes the vertical dimension with elastic cross members extending vertically from the frame, and the independent suspension units are arranged to optimize space utilization. This dimensional approach allows accommodation of increased volume requirements for battery modules near electric machines without compromising horizontal space or suspension performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Volume of moving object

If a compact suspension design is implemented, then space utilization is improved, but the mechanical properties and suspension capacity may be compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesuspension system volumeVSAvoidmechanical properties
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The suspension system employs elastic cross members made from materials with optimized mechanical properties, combining strength and flexibility. The damping elements are designed with composite structures that provide both structural integrity and damping capability, maintaining mechanical properties while achieving compact dimensions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

Each suspension unit is designed with locally optimized components, where the elastic cross member (7) and damping elements are specifically configured for their local functional requirements. This allows compact design in non-critical areas while maintaining full mechanical properties in load-bearing regions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The suspension system effectively dampens vertical, transverse, and longitudinal movements while maintaining excellent mechanical properties, accommodating electric traction modules and ensuring high suspension capacity, versatility, and compactness.

Implementation Method 1

comprising a metal elastic cross member (7)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

equipped with damping elements

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDamping: Damping

Data Source

PatentEP4190601B1Vehicle with an improved suspension system
Publication Date: 2024.07.24 IVECO SPA
  • EP4190601B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP4190601B1 patent drawingFigure 3~5
  • EP4190601B1 patent drawingFigure 4a~4c

AI summary

Suspension system (1) of a vehicle configured to connect at least one electric traction module (2; M) to a frame (3) of the vehicle, the vehicle extending along a longitudinal axis (A) and the electric traction module (2; M) being placed along a transverse axis (B) inclined with respect to the longitudinal axis (A), the suspension system (1) comprising for each left and right side: a support element (7) comprising a front portion and a rear portion (7a, 7b) each operatively connected to the frame (3) and an intermediate portion (7c) comprised between the latter; a damping unit (8), a pair of longitudinal retaining elements (15, 17) and a transverse retaining element (18) operatively interposed between the support element (7) and the frame (3); the suspension system (1) comprising a stabilizer bar (29) which is operatively interposed between the left and right side.