Agricultural Tractor Drive Arrangement RPM Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing agricultural tractors require cumbersome manual adjustments to set engine RPM limits based on power take-off (PTO) transmission steps, lacking the ability to independently set and limit both engine and PTO RPMs, which is inconvenient and potentially damaging.

Innovation Solution

A control unit connected to operator input devices for setting desired engine and maximum PTO RPMs, with sensors to regulate engine RPM based on actual PTO RPM, allowing easy adjustment and prevention of excessive RPMs across different transmission steps.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a limiting potentiometer is provided to set maximum engine RPM, then engine RPM can be limited, but the operator must manually re-adjust the potentiometer whenever a different PTO transmission step is selected

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveengine RPM limitingVSAvoidpotentiometer adjustment
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The control unit continuously receives feedback from the PTO RPM sensor about the actual PTO speed and automatically adjusts the engine RPM limit accordingly. This closed-loop feedback system eliminates the need for manual potentiometer adjustment when changing PTO transmission steps, as the system self-regulates based on real-time PTO speed measurements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs the RPM limiting function automatically without requiring operator intervention. The control unit monitors PTO RPM via the sensor and autonomously adjusts engine RPM limits based on the selected transmission step, making the system self-adjusting and eliminating manual re-calibration needs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If engine RPM is limited to protect PTO accessories, then PTO accessories are protected from damage, but the operator cannot set engine RPM separately from PTO RPM

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovePTO accessory protectionVSAvoidindependent RPM setting
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system separates the control of engine RPM and PTO RPM into independent parameters. The operator can set a desired engine RPM using the first input device and a maximum PTO RPM using the second input device. The control unit then manages the relationship between these two parameters, allowing independent setting while maintaining protective limiting functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts engine RPM based on the relationship between desired engine RPM and maximum PTO RPM. The control unit continuously monitors both parameters and automatically regulates engine speed to ensure PTO speed does not exceed the set maximum, while still allowing the operator to independently specify both RPM values.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Adaptability or versatility

If a sensor for capturing PTO RPM and automatic control is implemented, then independent setting of engine and PTO RPM is enabled, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveindependent RPM settingVSAvoidcontrol system
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control unit serves multiple functions: it manages the multi-step PTO transmission, captures and processes PTO RPM sensor data, regulates engine RPM based on operator inputs, and enforces the maximum PTO RPM limit. By consolidating these diverse functions into a single control unit, the system achieves high adaptability without proportionally increasing overall complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system combines the PTO transmission control, RPM sensing, engine regulation, and limit enforcement functions into an integrated control unit. This merging of previously separate functions into a single controller simplifies the overall system architecture while enabling independent RPM setting and automatic protection capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS7331901B2Drive arrangement for an agricultural working machine
Publication Date: 2008.02.19 DEERE & CO
  • US7331901B2 patent drawing
  • US7331901B2 patent drawing
  • US7331901B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A drive arrangement for an agricultural machine with an internal combustion engine used to drive removable agricultural implements. The engine is connected to a control unit and to a power take-off (PTO), which drives the removable agricultural implements, by means of a power take-off transmission with selectable transmission steps. The engine is further coupled to a sensor that captures the RPM of the PTO outlet, to a first operator input device that influences the RPM of the combustion engine and to a second operator input device that inputs a maximum RPM of the PTO output. The control unit controls the RPM of the combustion engine to the input value of the first operator input device while limiting the RPM of the engine based on the RPM at the PTO outlet, which cannot exceed the input value of the second operator input device.