Tractor PTO Control via Baler Sensor Feedback

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing agricultural round balers lack efficient automation for the power take-off (PTO) operation, leading to manual intervention, potential damage, and reduced operational safety, especially during bale ejection and varying crop conditions.

Innovation Solution

A control system that coordinates the operation of a tractor's PTO with a connected baler using a shared electronic controller area network (CAN bus) to sense and respond to baler conditions such as tailgate position, crop pick-up status, and torque levels, automating PTO engagement and disengagement, and providing operator notifications to prevent unintended actions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If manual operation of PTO is used, then operator control is maintained, but operational efficiency is reduced and safety risks increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational efficiencyVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The PTO control system automatically manages its own engagement and disengagement based on sensor inputs from baler conditions (tailgate position, crop pickup status, torque levels). The system serves itself by making control decisions without requiring manual operator intervention, thereby improving operational efficiency while maintaining manageable complexity through rule-based automation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors baler operating conditions through sensors and uses this feedback to automatically adjust PTO engagement status. The control system receives real-time data about tailgate position, crop pickup status, and torque levels, then responds by engaging or disengaging the PTO accordingly, creating a closed-loop control system that improves efficiency without excessive complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If PTO remains engaged during bale ejection, then continuous power is maintained, but equipment wear increases and damage risk occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveequipment lifespanVSAvoidautomated PTO control
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSExtent of automation

Solution Approach 1:

The system proactively disengages the PTO before bale ejection events occur by monitoring tailgate position sensors. When the tailgate begins to open, the control system anticipates the upcoming ejection phase and disengages the PTO in advance, preventing belt damage and reducing wear before the harmful event occurs

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual mechanical control of the PTO with an electronic control system that uses sensors and microprocessors to automatically manage PTO engagement. This substitution of mechanical operator action with an automated electronic system reduces equipment wear during critical phases while maintaining continuous operation during productive phases

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Reliability

If operator manually manages PTO engagement, then control precision is maintained, but safety risks from inadvertent engagement increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperating safetyVSAvoidmanual control requirement
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The control system automatically manages PTO engagement and disengagement based on monitored baler conditions, eliminating the need for manual operator control decisions. The system serves itself by making safety-critical control decisions based on sensor inputs, thereby improving operating safety while reducing the operational burden on the operator

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors multiple safety-critical parameters including tailgate position, crop pickup status, and torque levels. This multi-parameter feedback system enables the control system to make informed safety decisions about PTO engagement, preventing inadvertent operation while maintaining ease of operation through automatic control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Productivity

If baler travels too quickly through windrow, then productivity increases, but torque overload and capacity overwhelm occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebaler travel speedVSAvoidtorque load
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The control system monitors torque levels in real-time through sensors and uses this feedback to manage PTO engagement. When torque levels approach overload thresholds, the system responds by disengaging the PTO, preventing capacity overwhelm and allowing the baler to maintain higher speeds during normal operation without risking torque damage

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentEP2292085B2Implement initiated control of tractor power take-off (PTO).
Publication Date: 2020.09.09 CNH IND ITALIA SPA
  • EP2292085B2 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2292085B2 patent drawingFigure 2

AI summary

A control system for managing the operation of a tractor PTO (20) using input conditions occurring in a connected baler (50). Baler conditions such as tailgate position, crop pickup position, bale wrapper status, and driveline torque are sensed in the baler, and communicated to an implement-mounted controller (200) whereupon control signals are initiated and communicated to a tractor-mounted controller (100) to manage operation of the tractor's PTO (20). Safety may be maintained through the use of operator acknowledgements in order to prevent unexpected engagement of the PTO and a manual override capability allows an operator to suspend automated operation at any time.