Trade Order Processing With Theoretical Price Indicators

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current trading systems provide insufficient information for investors to make informed trading decisions due to the complexity of modern financial instruments, limiting their ability to assess profitability and risk effectively.

Innovation Solution

A system and method that calculates a theoretical price based on market data and pricing parameters, compares proposed trades with this price, and visually displays profitability and risk indicators to facilitate intelligent trading decisions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of information

If current trading systems display only basic market data (bid/ask), then the system complexity remains low, but the information sufficiency for informed trading decisions deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinformation sufficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments information presentation by separating theoretical price calculations from market data display. The interface divides profitability indicators (theoretical price vs. market price comparisons) from risk indicators (delta, gamma, vega), allowing comprehensive information delivery without overwhelming complexity. Each segment serves a specific analytical purpose.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system adds a new dimension to traditional trading displays by introducing visual spatial relationships. Theoretical price indicators are positioned relative to market bid/ask prices on a graphical interface, creating a visual spectrum that instantly communicates profitability. This dimensional transformation converts abstract numerical comparisons into intuitive spatial relationships.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Reliability

If comprehensive trade analysis information is provided, then the quality of trading decisions improves, but the ease of operation deteriorates due to information overload

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetrading decision qualityVSAvoidease of use
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The interface applies local quality by giving different visual prominence to different types of information based on their importance for quick decision-making. Profitability indicators (theoretical price vs. market price) receive primary visual emphasis, while risk parameters (delta, gamma, vega) are displayed with secondary emphasis. This hierarchical visual organization allows traders to quickly grasp essential information while having access to comprehensive data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses color changes to encode profitability status and risk levels. Theoretical price indicators display different colors based on whether they exceed market prices (profitable) or fall below (unprofitable). Visual color coding transforms complex numerical analysis into immediate intuitive understanding, maintaining ease of operation while enhancing decision quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #32Color changes

3Measurement precision

If theoretical price calculations are performed in real-time, then the profitability assessment accuracy improves, but the processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprofitability assessment accuracyVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary action by pre-calculating theoretical prices based on input parameters (spot price, strike price, volatility, interest rates) before the trader needs to assess profitability. The pricing engine continuously updates theoretical prices in the background, so when a trader inputs market data, the comparison is already prepared. This eliminates real-time calculation delays during the decision-making moment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces manual mechanical calculation methods with automated electronic pricing engines. Complex options pricing models (Black-Scholes, binomial trees) are executed automatically by computer algorithms rather than manual calculation, achieving both high precision and rapid processing. This substitution enables real-time theoretical price generation without sacrificing accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS12443997B2System and method for processing a trade order
Publication Date: 2025.10.14 INTERCONTINENTAL EXCHANGE HOLDINGS INC
  • US12443997B2 patent drawing
  • US12443997B2 patent drawing
  • US12443997B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and apparatus for processing a trade order include a computer configured for receiving market data for a financial asset, receiving pricing parameters and receiving proposed order quantity and price data. The computer is further configured for constructing proposed trades based on the proposed order quantity and price data, and for calculating a theoretical price for the financial asset based on the market data, pricing parameters as well as the proposed order price data. In addition, the computer is configured for comparing the constructed trades with the theoretical price, and displaying market data indicators relative to the theoretical price indicators based on the comparison.