Automated Trade Settlement Pathway Selection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current electronic trading systems lack the ability to accommodate participant preferences for bilateral or cleared trades, failing to automatically default to a preferred method and integrate trades into a single price stream regardless of settlement details.

Innovation Solution

A trading system that receives and respects participant preferences for bilateral or cleared trades, establishes clearing accounts as needed, and automatically determines the trade method based on participant settings and credit limits, ensuring trades are either bilateral or cleared according to participant preferences while maintaining a unified price stream.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If trades are settled bilaterally between counterparties, then transaction costs are reduced and parties have more control, but credit risk increases and reliability decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransaction costVSAvoidcredit risk
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a clearinghouse as an intermediary entity that acts as the counterparty to both sides of a trade. The clearinghouse receives trade instructions from participants, nets obligations across multiple trades, and manages credit risk centrally. This mediator structure allows participants to trade with reduced credit risk exposure while maintaining the efficiency of bilateral settlement for eligible trades.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If trades are cleared through a third party clearinghouse, then credit risk is reduced and reliability increases, but transaction costs increase and operational complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecredit riskVSAvoidoperational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The clearinghouse is designed to perform multiple functions within a single institutional framework: it acts as counterparty to all trades, maintains central ledgers for netting obligations, manages credit risk exposure, and provides settlement services. This multi-functional design consolidates what would otherwise require separate systems and entities, reducing overall operational complexity despite the increased reliability functions provided.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Adaptability or versatility

If electronic exchanges accommodate both bilateral and cleared trading methods, then adaptability increases and participant flexibility improves, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetrading method flexibilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically determines the settlement method for each trade based on participant preferences, trade characteristics, and clearinghouse capacity. The clearinghouse can switch between acting as a direct counterparty for cleared trades and facilitating bilateral settlements for eligible trades, adjusting its role on a trade-by-trade basis. This dynamic adaptability allows the system to accommodate diverse participant needs without requiring rigid structural complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Productivity

If the system automatically defaults to a preferred trading method based on participant settings, then productivity increases and trading efficiency improves, but automation complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetrading efficiencyVSAvoidautomation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSExtent of automation

Solution Approach 1:

Participants pre-specify their settlement method preferences (bilateral or cleared) and credit limits before trading occurs. The clearinghouse stores these preferences and automatically applies them to determine the settlement method for each trade instruction received. This preliminary configuration eliminates the need for real-time negotiation or manual determination of settlement methods, significantly improving trading efficiency while keeping automation logic relatively simple based on pre-set parameters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS7685051B2System for settling over the counter trades
Publication Date: 2010.03.23 INTERCONTINENTAL EXCHANGE HOLDINGS INC
  • US7685051B2 patent drawing
  • US7685051B2 patent drawing
  • US7685051B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system for automatically determining a trade settlement pathway comprising: receiving trade pathway preferences from a first and second party with respect to each other; wherein the trade is settled through clearing if both parties have available accounts with a clearing firm and the trade satisfies each party's clearing account credit limitations; and wherein the trade is settled bilaterally if at least one party does not have an available clearing account or both parties prefer to settle the trade bilaterally, and the trade satisfies each party's bilateral credit limitations.