Electronic Trading System State Transition Priority Logic
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Electronic trading systems lack clear definitions of rules and conditions governing interactions between participants when transitioning from one trading state to another, affecting trading priority and exclusivity.
Innovation Solution
The system transitions from a first trading state to a second, determining trading rights based on existing order status and predetermined criteria for incoming contra orders, granting exclusive or semi-exclusive rights to participants who meet specific requirements, such as minimum order size and delta restrictions, and allowing adjustments to bids or offers to maintain trading privileges.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Adaptability or versatility
If trading systems use predetermined time intervals to make uncleared bids available to all participants, then accessibility and fairness are improved, but trading priority and exclusivity for certain participants are reduced
Solution Approach 1:
The patent applies dynamics by making the availability of bids dynamic rather than static. The system transitions from a fixed time-based approach to a dynamic approach where bid availability depends on real-time trading state transitions and participant priorities. This allows the system to adapt bid accessibility based on current market conditions and participant status, resolving the contradiction between accessibility and priority.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent changes the parameter that determines bid availability from time-based to state-based. Instead of using a predetermined time interval, the system uses trading state transitions (from first trading state to second trading state) as the controlling parameter. This parameter change enables the system to maintain trading priority for certain participants while still providing access to others under specific conditions.
2Adaptability or versatility
If the system transitions from first trading state to second trading state, then trading flexibility and adaptability are improved, but clarity and definition of trading rights are reduced
Solution Approach 1:
The patent applies preliminary action by establishing clear trading rights and priorities before the transition from the first to the second trading state occurs. The system determines which participants have trading rights in advance based on their status in the first trading state, ensuring that when the transition happens, the trading rights are already defined and clear, thus maintaining information clarity while enabling trading flexibility.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent uses feedback mechanisms to maintain clarity of trading rights during state transitions. The system continuously monitors and updates participant status information, providing feedback that ensures trading rights remain well-defined throughout the transition process. This feedback loop prevents ambiguity by constantly reinforcing the current trading state and associated rights.
3Productivity
If participants are granted exclusive trading rights in the second trading state, then trading efficiency and priority are improved, but system complexity and rule definition requirements are increased
Solution Approach 1:
The patent applies local quality by granting exclusive trading rights to specific participants based on their local status and characteristics rather than applying uniform rules to all participants. The system identifies participants with specific attributes (such as being the best bidder or offeror) and applies enhanced trading rights only to them, thereby maintaining high trading efficiency for qualified participants while avoiding unnecessary complexity for others.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent segments participants into different categories based on their trading status and rights. By dividing participants into groups with different levels of access and priority (such as those with exclusive rights versus those with standard access), the system manages complexity through structured classification rather than attempting to handle all participants uniformly, thus improving overall trading efficiency.
Data Source
AI summary
Systems and methods for trading an item in an electronic trading system are provided. The method preferably includes transitioning the trading system from a first trading state to a second trading state. Once the trading system has transitioned to the second state, the method includes determining whether an existing order qualifies for trading priority and/or exclusivity in the second trading state with respect to an incoming contra order. This determining of trading rights in the second trading state is preferably based on the status of trading priority in the first trading state and also a set of predetermined criteria with respect to an incoming contra order in the second trading state. If the existing order qualifies for trading priority, then the system preferably presents the incoming contra order for trading exclusively or semi-exclusively to the participant associated with the existing order.


