Traffic Camera Misalignment Detection via Scene Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional traffic camera diagnostics struggle to accurately detect subtle deterioration, such as camera misalignment, due to labor-intensive test pattern analysis and scene-dependent image analysis, which can be costly and yield sub-optimal results, especially for gradual faults.

Innovation Solution

A multi-level diagnostic approach that combines scene analysis to predict potential misalignment and test pattern analysis for confirmation, using thresholding to determine the severity of camera faults and automatically recalibrate or notify maintenance when necessary, thereby optimizing resource use and diagnostic accuracy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If test pattern analysis is used to detect camera deterioration, then measurement precision is improved, but device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecamera deterioration detection accuracyVSAvoiddiagnostic system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The diagnostic process is segmented into multiple phases: scene analysis phase for initial assessment, test pattern analysis phase for confirmation, and diagnostic response phase for calibration or notification. This segmentation allows the system to use simpler scene analysis for routine monitoring while reserving complex test pattern analysis for confirmed issues, thereby reducing overall system complexity while maintaining precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary scene analysis on all captured images to identify potential camera deterioration before initiating costly test pattern analysis. This preliminary action filters out false positives and reduces the frequency of complex test pattern analyses, making the overall diagnostic system more cost-effective and less complex while maintaining high detection accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Ease of operation

If scene analysis is used for camera diagnostics, then ease of operation is improved, but measurement precision deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvediagnostic process simplicityVSAvoidcamera misalignment detection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses feedback from scene analysis to trigger more precise test pattern analysis when necessary. Scene analysis provides continuous monitoring with simple operations, while test pattern analysis provides precise measurements when scene analysis indicates potential issues. This feedback loop combines the ease of operation of scene analysis with the precision of test pattern analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent merges scene analysis and test pattern analysis into a unified diagnostic system that leverages the strengths of both approaches. Scene analysis provides continuous, simple monitoring while test pattern analysis provides precise measurements when needed, creating a hybrid system that achieves both ease of operation and measurement precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Measurement precision

If test pattern analysis is performed frequently, then measurement precision is improved, but loss of time and resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecamera fault detection accuracyVSAvoiddiagnostic time and resource consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary scene analysis on all images to identify potential camera deterioration before initiating costly and time-consuming test pattern analysis. This preliminary action filters out false positives and reduces the frequency of complex test pattern analyses, thereby reducing time and resource consumption while maintaining high detection accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies partial test pattern analysis only when scene analysis indicates potential camera issues, rather than performing complete test pattern analysis continuously. This partial action approach reduces time and resource consumption while maintaining sufficient measurement precision for detecting actual camera faults.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

4Measurement precision

If on-site camera inspections are conducted, then measurement precision is improved, but object-affected harmful factors increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecamera alignment verification accuracyVSAvoidtraffic disruption and technician safety risks
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces mechanical on-site inspections with automated image-based diagnostic systems. The system uses scene analysis and test pattern analysis of captured images to detect camera misalignment and deterioration, eliminating the need for physical technician presence at camera locations. This substitution maintains measurement precision while eliminating traffic disruption and safety risks associated with on-site inspections.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS9060164B2Intelligent use of scene and test pattern analyses for traffic camera diagnostics
Publication Date: 2015.06.16 CONDUENT BUSINESS SERVICES LLC
  • US9060164B2 patent drawing
  • US9060164B2 patent drawing
  • US9060164B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for determining a response to misalignment of a camera monitoring a desired area includes acquiring temporal related frames from the camera including a reference frame. A pixel location is determined of a reference object from the frames. Using the pixel location of the reference object, a displacement of the camera between a current frame and the reference frame is determined. For the displacement exceeding a first threshold, a new displacement of the camera is measured by introducing at least one additional object to a camera field of view and comparing the new displacement to a second threshold. For the new displacement not exceeding the second threshold, the camera is recalibrated using a determined pixel location and a physical location of the at least one additional object. For the new displacement exceeding the second threshold, notification is provided of a misalignment to an associated user device.