Traffic Light Driver Assistance with Careless-State Alert Suppression

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Drivers may feel annoyed when alerted for a right turn despite a traffic light being in a passage prohibited state, especially if they are not in a careless driving state.

Innovation Solution

A driving assistance apparatus that determines a driver's intentions and state of alertness to suppress alerts when they are not in a careless driving state, even if the traffic light is in a passage prohibited state, using sensors and cameras to assess acceleration, deceleration, steering, and wakefulness.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If driving assistance alerts are issued when the traffic light is in a passage prohibited state, then the safety and compliance of the driving assistance system is improved, but the driver experience deteriorates due to annoyance from unnecessary alerts

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety and complianceVSAvoiddriver experience
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts the driving assistance alert behavior based on the detected driver state. When the driver is determined to be in a non-careless state (attentive, following traffic rules), the alert is suppressed. When the driver is in a careless state (distracted, ignoring traffic signals), the alert is issued. This dynamic adaptation resolves the contradiction by making the system's safety function conditional on the driver's actual behavior state.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the operational parameter of alert issuance based on the driver state parameter. By detecting parameters such as eye movement, head position, and driving operations, the system determines whether to activate or suppress the alert function. This parameter-based control allows the system to maintain safety when needed while avoiding unnecessary alerts that would annoy attentive drivers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of operation

If the system suppresses driving assistance alerts when the driver is not in a careless driving state, then the driver experience is improved by reducing annoyance, but the safety monitoring function deteriorates by potentially missing harmful situations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedriver experienceVSAvoidsafety monitoring
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously monitors driver state through multiple sensors (camera, operation detection unit) and uses this feedback to dynamically control alert issuance. The feedback loop ensures that the system only suppresses alerts when it is confident the driver is attentive and following traffic rules, while maintaining alert functionality when careless driving is detected, thus preserving safety monitoring while improving driver experience.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The driver state determination unit acts as an intermediary between the traffic light state detection and the alert issuance. This intermediary layer analyzes driver behavior and mediates whether the alert should be transmitted to the driver, ensuring that safety alerts are only suppressed when the driver is genuinely attentive, thereby maintaining safety monitoring effectiveness while reducing unnecessary alerts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Measurement precision

If the system uses multiple detection methods (acceleration, deceleration, steering, turn intention) to determine driver state, then the accuracy of driver state determination is improved, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedriver state determination accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses a single driver state determination unit that performs multiple detection functions (acceleration intention, deceleration intention, steering intention, turn intention) through integrated analysis of driver operations. This multi-functional approach improves measurement precision by considering multiple driving parameters simultaneously while avoiding the complexity of separate detection systems for each parameter, as all functions are unified in one determination unit.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS12371042B2Driving assistance apparatus
Publication Date: 2025.07.29 TOYOTA JIDOSHA KK
  • US12371042B2 patent drawing
  • US12371042B2 patent drawing
  • US12371042B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A driving assistance apparatus configured to provide driving assistance regarding a traffic light to a driver of a host vehicle when the traffic light in front of the host vehicle is in a passage prohibited state, wherein the driving assistance apparatus determines whether the driver is in a careless driving state, and suppresses driving assistance regarding the traffic light when the driver is determined to be in the careless driving state even when the traffic light in front of the host vehicle is in the passage prohibited state.