Traffic Light Detection Reliability Verification

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Motor vehicles often experience unnecessary standstills at traffic lights due to incorrect detection of light signals by driver assistance systems, leading to driver reliance on malfunctioning devices and failure to notice signal changes.

Innovation Solution

A method and device that detect relevant traffic light signals, analyze operating data to determine reliability, and generate confirmation signals to inform drivers of verified selections, ensuring accurate reminders for onward travel through acoustic and optical alerts.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a driver assistance system detects light signals without reliability verification, then the system operates simply and quickly, but the detection reliability decreases leading to unnecessary standstills

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection reliabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system analyzes operating data (image quality, detection confidence, environmental conditions) to generate a reliability value that feeds back into the decision-making process. This feedback mechanism allows the system to verify detection reliability before triggering reminders, resolving the contradiction between simple operation and reliable detection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary analysis of operating data and calculates reliability values before finalizing detection results. By conducting this preliminary verification step, the system ensures detection accuracy without requiring complex post-processing or manual intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If the system provides reminders without reliability verification, then the response time is fast, but unnecessary standstills occur due to incorrect detections

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereminder accuracyVSAvoidwait time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The reliability value calculated from operating data provides feedback that determines whether a reminder should be issued. This feedback loop ensures that only reliable detections trigger reminders, improving accuracy while maintaining efficient response times by avoiding unnecessary verification steps for low-confidence detections.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system adjusts the threshold for issuing reminders based on reliability parameters. When reliability is high, reminders are issued quickly; when reliability is low, the system withholds reminders or requests additional verification, thereby optimizing the balance between response time and accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If the system analyzes operating data to determine reliability, then detection accuracy improves, but the processing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection precisionVSAvoidprocessing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses feedback from operating data analysis to adjust detection parameters and verify results. This feedback mechanism improves measurement precision by continuously learning from system performance while maintaining manageable processing complexity through iterative refinement rather than complex algorithms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs self-verification by analyzing its own operating data to determine detection reliability. This self-service approach improves detection precision without requiring external verification systems, thereby limiting the increase in processing complexity to internal data analysis only.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Loss of information

If the system issues go reminders without verification, then driver information is provided quickly, but drivers receive incorrect information leading to unnecessary standstills

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinformation accuracyVSAvoidverification complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The verification process uses feedback from multiple sources (image analysis, operating data, reliability thresholds) to confirm the accuracy of go reminders before issuance. This multi-layered feedback system ensures information accuracy while keeping verification complexity manageable through structured decision protocols.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary verification of detection reliability before issuing go reminders. By conducting this preliminary check using operating data and reliability thresholds, the system ensures accurate information delivery without requiring complex real-time verification during the reminder issuance process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS10930148B2Method and device for reminding a driver about an approach to a light signal apparatus
Publication Date: 2021.02.23 BAYERISCHE MOTOREN WERKE AG
  • US10930148B2 patent drawing
  • US10930148B2 patent drawing
  • US10930148B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method reminds a driver of a motor vehicle about an approach to a light signal apparatus. The method detects a plurality of light signal apparatuses, selects from the plurality of light signal apparatuses in order to select that one which is relevant to a direction of travel of the motor vehicle to determine an assignment of the detected light signal to the motor vehicle, and determines whether the detected light signal from the selected light signal apparatus is a stop light signal. The method generates a stop signal if a stop light signal is detected when the motor vehicle is at a standstill. When a stop signal is present, the method determines a reliability value depending on the at least one operating variable of the motor vehicle for the selection of the light signal apparatus, generates a confirmation signal verifying the selection, depending on the reliability value, and outputs the confirmation signal in order to inform the driver about a verified selection, and generates a starting signal reminding the driver to start, depending on the reliability value, when a changeover on a traffic light signal is detected.