Traffic Light Violation Detection for Relevant Signal Selection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Detecting traffic light violations in video recordings from connected vehicles is challenging due to difficulties in determining the relevant traffic light among multiple lights and handling corner cases such as highway ramps, right turns on red lights, and flashing lights, leading to potential misdetections or non-detections.

Innovation Solution

An anti-causal algorithm combining deep learning models, video information, speed data, and heuristics to accurately detect traffic light violations without relying on high-definition satellite maps, accounting for corner cases like highway ramps and right turns on red lights.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If multiple traffic lights are detected in a scene, then the system can identify more potential violations, but the difficulty of determining which traffic light is relevant to the vehicle increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveviolation detection accuracyVSAvoidtraffic light relevance determination
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the detection process into distinct stages: first detecting all traffic lights in the scene, then determining which ones are relevant to the vehicle's lane and direction, and finally analyzing compliance with those specific lights. This segmentation allows the system to handle multiple traffic lights systematically by breaking down the complex determination into manageable steps.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intermediary classification layer that acts as a mediator between traffic light detection and violation determination. This intermediary step classifies detected traffic lights as relevant or irrelevant based on their relationship to the vehicle's position, lane, and intended direction, thereby resolving the ambiguity when multiple lights are present.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If the system accounts for corner cases like highway ramps and right turns on red lights, then false detections are reduced, but the complexity of the detection algorithm increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefalse positive reductionVSAvoidalgorithm complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary classification of traffic light scenarios before making violation determinations. By pre-identifying corner cases such as highway ramps, intersections with multiple relevant lights, and situations where right turns on red are permitted, the system can apply appropriate rules in advance, reducing false positives without requiring complex real-time analysis for each corner case.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies different detection rules and criteria based on local characteristics of each scene. For example, on highway ramps different rules apply compared to urban intersections, and right turn permissions are determined by local traffic patterns and signage. This localized approach allows the system to handle corner cases appropriately without requiring a single complex algorithm for all situations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Loss of time

If the system processes video recordings in real-time, then timely violation detection is achieved, but the computational resources required increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection response timeVSAvoidcomputational resource consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs partial processing by focusing computational resources only on relevant portions of the video stream. Instead of analyzing every frame in full detail, the system identifies key moments such as traffic light state changes, vehicle position changes, and potential violation events, then applies detailed analysis only at these critical points. This reduces overall computational resource consumption while maintaining timely detection capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS20250391179A1Systems and methods for detecting traffic light violations
Publication Date: 2025.12.25 VERIZON PATENT & LICENSING INC
  • US20250391179A1 patent drawing
  • US20250391179A1 patent drawing
  • US20250391179A1 patent drawing

AI summary

In some implementations, a server may obtain a video recording of a scene captured by a camera onboard a vehicle. The server may perform an object detection that indicates a presence of a traffic light in a frame of the video recording. The server may determine a red light probability that the frame contains at least one relevant red traffic light for the vehicle. The server may calculate a violation score based on the object detection and the red light probability with respect to the frame. The server may determine whether the vehicle is associated with a traffic light violation based on the violation score in relation to a threshold.