Traffic Scenario Classification Using Driver Reaction and Location Data

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current driver assistance systems (DAS) and highly automated driving functions (HAD) face challenges in identifying and classifying safety-critical traffic scenarios due to insufficient data classification and the rarity of extreme situations, which can lead to errors in vehicle control, especially in dynamic environmental conditions.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that combine data from vehicle sensors and detectors with physiological and physical driver reactions, using geographic coordinates to identify and classify safety-critical scenarios, incorporating features from various data sources like cartographic information, traffic data, and weather information, to determine scenario types and difficulty values.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Extent of automation

If driver assistance systems and highly automated driving functions are implemented, then vehicle control automation is improved, but safety and reliability deteriorate due to insufficient identification of safety-critical scenarios

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevehicle control automationVSAvoidsafety and reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary identification and classification of safety-critical traffic scenarios by analyzing driver reactions (physiological and physical) before actual critical incidents occur. Data from sensors monitoring driver heart rate, pupil dilation, steering wheel grip, and brake activation are collected and evaluated in advance to predict and prepare for potential safety-critical situations, enabling preventive measures rather than reactive responses

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements continuous feedback loops where sensor data from the driver's physiological and physical reactions are constantly monitored and fed back to the control system. This feedback mechanism allows the system to adaptively adjust its safety assessments and control actions based on real-time driver state, improving reliability through dynamic response to changing conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Measurement precision

If comprehensive data collection from multiple sensors is performed, then identification accuracy of safety-critical scenarios is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveidentification accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the complex data collection and evaluation process into distinct functional modules: physiological reaction sensing (heart rate, pupil dilation), physical reaction sensing (steering wheel grip, brake activation), data transmission, and scenario classification. Each module handles specific aspects of safety-critical scenario identification independently, making the overall complex system manageable through modular architecture

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces intermediate processing layers that mediate between raw sensor data and final safety-critical scenario identification. Data from multiple sensors are aggregated and pre-processed through intermediate evaluation units that filter, correlate, and prepare data before final classification, reducing the direct complexity burden on the core identification algorithm

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Speed

If real-time data processing from multiple sources is implemented, then scenario classification speed is improved, but data processing load increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescenario classification speedVSAvoiddata processing load
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs periodic sampling of driver reaction data at optimized intervals rather than continuous monitoring. Sensors capture physiological and physical reactions at specific time periods, and data evaluation occurs in periodic cycles, reducing overall processing load while maintaining sufficient classification speed for safety-critical scenario identification

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements selective data processing where not all sensor data are processed with equal intensity. High-priority data streams (such as sudden brake activation or extreme steering inputs) receive intensive real-time processing, while lower-priority data undergo lighter processing or batch evaluation, optimizing the balance between classification speed and processing load

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS11801843B2Method, system, and computer program product for determining safety-critical traffic scenarios for driver assistance systems (DAS) and highly automated driving functions (HAD)
Publication Date: 2023.10.31 DR ING H C F PORSCHE AG
  • US11801843B2 patent drawing
  • US11801843B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method determines safety-critical traffic scenarios for driver assistance systems and highly automated driving functions for a motor vehicle. A safety-critical traffic scenario has a scenario type, a location determined geographic coordinates, and a safety value. The method includes: recording first data of a vehicle while driving along a route, assigning geographic coordinates to the first data in each case; recording second data for capturing physiological and physical reactions of a driver of a vehicle while driving along the route, assigning geographic coordinates to the second data in each case; transmitting the first and second data to a data evaluation unit; combining the first data and the second data having the same geographic coordinates so that they represent data at a specific geographic location; identifying a scenario for the specific geographic location based on the first and second data; classifying the identified scenario with a difficulty value.