Traffic Signaling Prediction Model Using Dual State Data

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current signaling systems for traffic control, particularly light signaling systems, face challenges in accurately predicting switching states and times, which affects vehicle control and traffic regulation, leading to suboptimal prediction quality and potential inefficiencies in energy management and automated driving applications.

Innovation Solution

A method that acquires and combines first and second state data from signaling system controllers and external sources to train a prediction model, enabling the prediction of switching states and times, and outputs these predictions to vehicles for improved traffic management and energy optimization, without requiring extensive infrastructure changes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If only relevant state data are used for prediction, then prediction quality is improved, but data acquisition complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction qualityVSAvoiddata acquisition complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The prediction system segments data acquisition into two distinct channels: a signaling system interface for acquiring first state data (switching states, timing parameters) and a communication interface for acquiring second state data (environmental conditions, traffic patterns). This segmentation allows selective collection of only relevant data types needed for accurate prediction while managing complexity through modular data sources.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The prediction device is designed with multi-functional interfaces that can acquire multiple types of state data through unified data processing pathways. The signaling system interface and communication interface both feed into the same prediction model, allowing the system to handle diverse data sources (detector data, traffic data, environmental data) through a universal processing framework, reducing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Measurement precision

If a comprehensive prediction model is implemented, then prediction accuracy is improved, but computational resources required increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction accuracyVSAvoidcomputational resources
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSPower

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts and utilizes only the essential state data that directly influence switching behavior—specifically first state data from the signaling system controller (switching states, cycle times, detector inputs) and relevant second state data from communication interfaces (traffic patterns, environmental conditions). By extracting only the critical data elements needed for prediction rather than processing all available data, the model achieves good accuracy with reduced computational overhead.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Ease of manufacture

If existing signaling system infrastructure is used without replacement, then cost is reduced, but integration complexity with prediction system increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovecostVSAvoidintegration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The prediction device acts as an intermediary layer between the existing signaling system controller and the vehicle or traffic management system. It connects to the signaling system controller through a signaling system interface to acquire state data, processes this data along with additional information from communication interfaces, and generates predictions without requiring modification or replacement of the original signaling system controller. This intermediary approach enables integration with legacy infrastructure while maintaining prediction functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of replacing the existing signaling system controller, the invention creates a virtual copy or model of the controller's state data by reading and processing its outputs through the signaling system interface. The prediction device reconstructs and analyzes the controller's internal state and switching logic software-based, eliminating the need for expensive hardware replacement while achieving the same predictive functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentUS12131638B2Method and device for predicting a switching state and/or a switching time of a signaling system for traffic control
Publication Date: 2024.10.29 YUNEX GMBH
  • US12131638B2 patent drawing
  • US12131638B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method predicts a switch state and/or a switch time point of a signaling system. The method includes collecting first and second state data, the first and second state data influencing the switch state and/or switch time point. The collection of the first state data includes reading of state data from a signaling system control device of the signaling system by a signaling system interface. The collection of the second state data includes reading in of the state data. A prediction model is provided and configured to make a prediction of the switch time point and/or the switch state of the signaling system based on first and second state data. The switch state and/or the switch time point of the signaling system is predicted via the prediction model using the first and second state data. The predicted switch state and/or switch time point of the signaling system is outputted.