Automated Traffic Synchronization via Vehicle Feedback

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Random driver responses to traffic events lead to 'start-stop' traffic patterns, increasing the risk of collisions and reducing traffic efficiency, especially in congested conditions.

Innovation Solution

An automated traffic synchronization system that determines spatial and performance information for vehicles, calculates synchronized control actions based on traffic signaling and driver status, and communicates these actions to vehicles for optimized acceleration, deceleration, and timing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If each driver controls their vehicle independently with random response times to traffic events, then driver autonomy and individual decision-making are maintained, but traffic patterns become random and chaotic leading to start-stop traffic flow and increased collision risk

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedriver autonomyVSAvoidtraffic flow predictability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback by continuously monitoring traffic conditions, vehicle positions, and driver responses, then using this information to calculate and communicate optimized control actions back to drivers. This closed-loop feedback system transforms random independent driver responses into coordinated traffic flow while preserving driver autonomy through informed decision-making.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The traffic synchronization device acts as an intermediary between traffic regulation systems and individual drivers. It receives traffic signaling information, processes spatial and performance data, and translates this into synchronized control recommendations, mediating between centralized traffic control and individual driver autonomy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Adaptability or versatility

If drivers respond to traffic events with varying response times and attention levels, then individual driver characteristics are preserved, but traffic efficiency decreases due to random start-stop patterns at intersections

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedriver individualityVSAvoidtraffic flow efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts control recommendations based on real-time traffic conditions, vehicle performance characteristics, and driver behavior patterns. This dynamic adaptation allows the system to optimize traffic flow efficiency while accommodating individual driver characteristics and vehicle differences.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes operational parameters such as acceleration rates, deceleration rates, and timing of control actions based on traffic conditions and vehicle characteristics. By dynamically adjusting these parameters, the system improves traffic efficiency while adapting to individual vehicle and driver needs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Device complexity

If traditional traffic signaling systems are used without vehicle coordination, then system simplicity is maintained, but collisions occur and traffic safety is compromised due to uncoordinated vehicle responses

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetraffic control system simplicityVSAvoidcollision risk
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary calculations of synchronized control actions before traffic events occur. By pre-calculating optimal acceleration, deceleration, and timing based on current traffic conditions and vehicle positions, the system prevents collisions before they happen while maintaining relatively simple infrastructure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Reliability

If automated traffic synchronization is implemented to coordinate vehicle movements, then traffic safety and efficiency are improved, but system complexity increases due to real-time data processing and communication requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetraffic safetyVSAvoidsynchronization system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The traffic synchronization device performs multiple functions including spatial relationship determination, performance information processing, traffic signaling reception, synchronized control calculation, and communication with vehicles. This multi-functionality consolidates complex operations into a single integrated system, improving safety while managing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS9147348B2Automated traffic synchronization
Publication Date: 2015.09.29 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US9147348B2 patent drawing
  • US9147348B2 patent drawing
  • US9147348B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Vehicle performance capability information and spatial relationship information within a vehicular environment is obtained for each of a group of vehicles. Traffic light signaling information is obtained. At least one synchronized control action is determined for each of the group of vehicles by utilizing the vehicle performance capability information in conjunction with the spatial relationship information and the traffic light signaling information.