L-Shaped Trailer Beam Supports for Plate Mounting

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing solutions for supporting component mounting plates between trailer I-beams are complex and costly to fabricate, leading to high production expenses due to intricate shapes and designs.

Innovation Solution

The apparatus employs a pair of top and bottom supporting members, each L-shaped, that span between the flanges of trailer I-beams, secured by fastening mechanisms with threaded bolts and nuts, allowing for straightforward fabrication and assembly with minimal bends and parts, reducing complexity and costs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If mounting elements are designed with complex shapes to provide openings for receiving I-beam edges, then the supporting function is improved, but fabrication costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesupporting functionVSAvoidfabrication cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The mounting element is divided into a flat plate portion and a separate engagement portion that receives the I-beam edge. This segmentation allows each part to be simpler in shape while collectively providing the required supporting function, reducing fabrication complexity and cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The complex engagement features are extracted from the main plate body and implemented as separate components or simplified geometric features on the plate. This extraction reduces the overall shape complexity of the mounting element while maintaining its functional capability to support and secure the I-beam.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Reliability

If sliding guides and clamp plates are designed with multiple features (raised teeth, fixing pins, cutouts, notches, recesses), then the attachment function is improved, but fabrication costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveattachment functionVSAvoidfabrication cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The attachment system is segmented into distinct functional components: sliding guides for positioning, clamp plates for securing, and fixing pins for locking. Each component has a simplified shape focused on its specific function, avoiding the need for complex integrated features, thereby reducing fabrication costs while maintaining attachment reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The clamp plates and sliding guides are designed with standardized shapes that can serve multiple attachment points and configurations. This universality reduces the need for custom complex shapes at each location, simplifying fabrication while providing reliable attachment functionality across the entire structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Reliability

If mounting elements have complex shapes with multiple bends, then the engagement with I-beams is improved, but fabrication complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveengagement capabilityVSAvoidshape complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The mounting element's engagement capability is achieved through segmentation rather than complex continuous shaping. The flat plate portion provides the mounting surface while separate engagement portions or simplified geometric features provide the I-beam reception, reducing overall shape complexity while maintaining engagement reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS11001321B2Apparatus for supporting a component mounting plate between trailer beams
Publication Date: 2021.05.11 BENDIX COMMERCIAL VEHICLE SYSTEMS LLC
  • US11001321B2 patent drawing
  • US11001321B2 patent drawing
  • US11001321B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An apparatus is provided for supporting a component mounting plate that is suspended between a first trailer beam and a second trailer beam. The apparatus comprises a pair of top supporting members including (i) a first top supporting member secured to the plate, and (ii) a second top supporting member secured to the plate. Each of the first and second top members spans between and engages the first and second trailer beams. The apparatus also comprises a pair of bottom supporting members including a first bottom supporting member and a second bottom supporting member. The apparatus further comprises a pair of fastening mechanisms including (i) a first fastening mechanism that secures at least the first top member to the plate, and (ii) a second fastening mechanism that secures at least the second top member to the plate.